the problem with unique items in games like this is they can not imbalance game play, so are only decorative or tempory items at best not the type of thing players spend lots of money on, but some do. Flags or statues always seem popular.
I have been thinking about this as this is an important aspect yet to be added. I do think an actual map is needed and that it needs 1v1 in some way. So I think my idea needs a small mod. We need a ranking system for alliances so we have battles with a few alliances on a map. The battles for...
Thanks for the feed back
The 1v1 is on a individual map square. As a player in an alliance taking part. First I enter into the active pool when I click to view the map its like entering a holding room, next I select a map section I wish to try to win for my alliance. The game then auto selects...
Yes you are being unfair, if your stealing 150k of a max of 161k from Iron Age players then that is very bad for the game and its players, and no If its 5-25k who cares.... If you like a game that rewards unfair tactics try "war of nations" cash is king and when you get to the top the game does...
I can agree with that an Iron Age players max is 160k if he thinks its ok for a player 30-40 levels higher to take 150k then I am glad he doesn't run this game....
If your a top player for real then this must happen a lot I have only played a few days with no cash and I am maxed base sat upgrading my town hall to go to classical age at level 22 there are only 2 reasons players attack you, easy medals or loot, this is a game where upgrades in Iron Age cost...
I agree they didn't hit them for resources as they got very little, the players medals ranking is what did them this game is easy to climb up as the game gives you targets in your age range and your medal count you automatically click past players well over your level when you are looking for...
I just want to put these out there as ideas this is not to say your ideas are wrong and are not better is just a variation I want to put in the mix. ---------------------------------------------- I think that if they go along the lines of civ which is part of there design now, they would use...
depending on a players willingness to spend its a forgone conclusion some players will always be maxed out. The only real way to extend a game play ability is to make it tactical hard to be on top so that its skill on its own that sets players above the rest not cash. Having tactically diverse...
Its a common thing in games to be able to do this you can have units building as you lose them so when you get back from the battle replacements are already on there way but limits should be in place two that you cannot queue up more than your max army size. So players don't hide massive...
I think it should be done more like cultural influence you introduce the new element into your nation you then get points that build up over time you then spend these points to implement the Change over, you pick what ability goes and which you get. So as your game progresses it become like we...
Well if they follow CIV rules they will level up in some way or gain Xp that you can spend, but that would make me more reluctant to go on resource runs that are obvious no win matches but the rewards are high. As valuable units with Xp would make me reluctant to go all in and risk losing them...
just so clicking on the road makes building connected to the town hall glow this is all you need to see which are connected and which are not I managed 230% boost at Iron Age just as I am entering classical age. The few I cannot link are because of how my defences are setup. Trees and gold...
It works both ways I have had players that are many levels above me as targets, I am not sure yet but level is not the only deciding factor in the selections the game offers you being at a high score when in a early age is easy I was at over 600 but when I scouted a few players at my score level...