Search results

Up

The third slot has been requested here for at least five years. But it is necessary to raise this topic :) It would be better to move some of the categories of improvements from the armory to other buildings corresponding to the profile. Improvements to coalitions, generals, and tactics need to...

At now we are getting a random bonus blessing, some are accumulating as unnecessary junk. I suggest that you do not give a specific blessing, but instead give the ability to create a blessing of a certain category. For example, a scroll to create any blessing the attack category, or blessing...

To ensure that the goods obtained in hunting and in battle are not useless prey, I propose to expand the possibilities of the temple, where goods can be spent usefully. Add accelerating blessings for the manufactory, university, and so on. In addition, the temple has a problem with the...

«You cannot expect..» No one expects it, so the developer is OBLIGED to give them a kick in the ass.

The mortar mounted on the dome of the Parliament looks silly. Draw a platform around the dome and infantry with a bazooka on it. The same infantry also leaves the Parliament when it is destroyed.

Up

If Nexon had halved appetite they would have made more money. Their greed is surprising! ))

Up

No matter if they improve it (which is possible), personally I am disgusted by the very idea of fusion councilors, it is primitive to the point of nausea.. it has no place in this game. They must to use another mechanism to improve the councilor, for example, applying a random feature card to...

Common sense keeps people from spending money for nothing.

Yes I made sure that blessings of the barracks troops affect the APC infantry. How do other buffs for barracks troops (as coalitions, museum artifacts, etc.) affect APC infantry?

This is an erroneous judgment. Barracks heavy infantry level (as well as any buff and improvements for HI) has nothing to do with the attacking APC HI troops.

Do not focus on the "natural" because there is nothing natural in this game! For example, this missile does not cause any damage to defense troops or buildings, is that natural?

FelipeXIX, one of the biggest mistakes you can make is to ignore the improvement of the generals. You should strive to have for attack the max lvl generals for your Age. ps. The second big mistake is ignoring the university.

Only one thing will help to make armies diverse - to limit the number of identical units. And to start with Eisenhowers - only one on the battlefield, any troop-cards type - only one, and no more than half of any units from the barracks / factory. But the years go by and they don't.

Yes, my comments have been pessimistic and dull for the last couple of years, I can't help but admit that.. because I don't see any positive changes and improvements in the game, and I no longer believe that it is possible to change this within the p2w model. And yes, I still play sometimes..

Oh, i missed…

Zaxillaxifrage correctly wrote we need a permanent exchange function of any NTG in a ratio of 2:1. This is the simplest and most effective solution.

It’s NOT reflective of history, absolutely! NO! Infantry and MBT are the basis of any army. Another thing is that it has nothing to do with this game. We have been investing in factory troops for a long time and this source of income for BHG is almost exhausted. It's time to devalue the...