“With 4 Eisenhower’s equipped you have just 5* an extremely high level base with insane museum stats. You do the same with your second attack and you feel elated. Next war is another humdinger, OMG, more Eisenhower’s. You cant stop wondering when the next Eisenhower sale is .. I think you get my point.”
Defenders always have the last laugh:
1. If you 5* their base they’ll say, “He had to use Eisenhower’s.“
2. If you don't they say, “He couldn’t even 5* my base with Eisenhower’s.”
With recent events all defenders got the RQ Pioneer for dirt cheap ($19.99) and with The current event the Vz-9 Avrocar for ($29.99), and they’ll have these legendaries for a lifetime.
1. Can you say the same with your Eisenhower purchases?
2. Do you see defenders spending money on premium TT’s? No, they sit back and let the insane attackers (each to their own) spend there $$$ on premium troops.
My point is that over the past year defence was given such a boost that attackers had no option to keep relying on premium TTs with each attack.
>>>>Clever ploy from BHG>>>>>>>
Tubman:
BHG confirmed that a house is still classified an economic building even with Tubman (Conductor) completed. Have you seen how fast these little f..ckers Spawn rifleman! I told them that this makes no sense:
1. If it spawns troops continuously it should be classified as a defender spawning building like garrisons and bunkers, with all relevant things having an effect on such a building like Blitz etc.
2. The only correct answer to this is that houses should only spawn troops on destruction with Tubman completion. (Defenders wont like this)
Parliament
1. Another defensive building.
2. With the next update parliament will probably spawn Eisenhower’s and Stallions!
Ive been playing the game for almost 3 years now and I dont like where the game is heading. The game is not balanced and attackers are dwindling in numbers and we have to say NO TO PAY TO WIN.
Defenders always have the last laugh:
1. If you 5* their base they’ll say, “He had to use Eisenhower’s.“
2. If you don't they say, “He couldn’t even 5* my base with Eisenhower’s.”
With recent events all defenders got the RQ Pioneer for dirt cheap ($19.99) and with The current event the Vz-9 Avrocar for ($29.99), and they’ll have these legendaries for a lifetime.
1. Can you say the same with your Eisenhower purchases?
2. Do you see defenders spending money on premium TT’s? No, they sit back and let the insane attackers (each to their own) spend there $$$ on premium troops.
My point is that over the past year defence was given such a boost that attackers had no option to keep relying on premium TTs with each attack.
>>>>Clever ploy from BHG>>>>>>>
Tubman:
BHG confirmed that a house is still classified an economic building even with Tubman (Conductor) completed. Have you seen how fast these little f..ckers Spawn rifleman! I told them that this makes no sense:
1. If it spawns troops continuously it should be classified as a defender spawning building like garrisons and bunkers, with all relevant things having an effect on such a building like Blitz etc.
2. The only correct answer to this is that houses should only spawn troops on destruction with Tubman completion. (Defenders wont like this)
Parliament
1. Another defensive building.
2. With the next update parliament will probably spawn Eisenhower’s and Stallions!
Ive been playing the game for almost 3 years now and I dont like where the game is heading. The game is not balanced and attackers are dwindling in numbers and we have to say NO TO PAY TO WIN.
