For high ages, the battle time should increase

[Uhuru]

For high ages, the battle time should increase.

 

[LordStark263AC]

Not necessarily, I'm gonna politely disagree.

I'm 281 SA and these days, after mastering Infiltrators style attack, my average time of attack in War is, give or take 10 seconds, 2 minutes and 10 seconds, on bases around my level. Sometimes even without TTs.

 

[Uhuru]

Hi, LordStark! Yes, an attack by commandos can please for the time being.. but at WW, a Ground attack against lvl 300+ with an adv Museum, shields, etc. won't get you 100% destruction on time.. Even if you have enough attack power, you just won't make it. Now this is solved only by air bombing.. the balance of troops is still not there..and the time limit exacerbates this imbalance which leads everyone to the only winning tactic..

 

[SomeRandomPlayer]

The point of more time allowing additional attack strategies is interesting. Not sure if I agree or disagree, but the idea is ponder worthy. It'd no doubt require a lot of careful convincing, however, perhaps with some examples. I'm always interested in allowing for more metas as there aren't many today; many that we know of at least.

 

[King Crimson]

Hi, LordStark! Yes, an attack by commandos can please for the time being.. but at WW, a Ground attack against lvl 300+ with an adv Museum, shields, etc. won't get you 100% destruction on time.. Even if you have enough attack power, you just won't make it. Now this is solved only by air bombing.. the balance of troops is still not there..and the time limit exacerbates this imbalance which leads everyone to the only winning tactic..

As others have pointed out, it is possible to get 100% on high level bases but a victory isn't only 100% destruction - even a 1 star victory is technically a victory.. Level 300+ bases are supposed to be hard to beat and it should take all your troops, concentration, etc and sometimes even then you won't make it. Sometimes you just can't win them all.

 

[Uhuru]

As others have pointed out, it is possible to get 100% on high level bases but a victory isn't only 100% destruction - even a 1 star victory is technically a victory.. Level 300+ bases are supposed to be hard to beat and it should take all your troops, concentration, etc and sometimes even then you won't make it. Sometimes you just can't win them all.

You think that winning in the fifth year of the game should be twice as difficult as, for example, in the third, do I understand correctly?

 

[King Crimson]

You can look at the words I wrote or you can interpret it any way you want. It's your choice.
Here's a hint. You don't need 100% for a victory.

 

[Black tiger]

It’s about the expectation that you should get five stars including quick victory on every base, no matter how strong. How can they expect us to five star this base? They don’t. Accept it.

 

[domifan]

Personally I feel BHG have found a sweet balance between attacking and defensive strengths. All that rebalancing they did last year would be nugatory if they just upped the time limit for higher ages. Don’t want the game too easy, else it’d just be boring.