Troop HP After Update

[Blood]

I’m not sure how the architecture of the game is written but I suppose that is possible. But you would think since the battle is more or less fought on your device the server would be irrelevant. That’s why people are able to hack their device and then send the battle data to the server. It may be incompetence, it may be intentional, it’s impossible to know for sure. But a lot of players are experiencing the same issues so it’s not our imaginations.
Honestly I don’t like the rebalance but would not complain about it if it were not for the museum. The rebalance was instituted for the sole purpose of selling artifacts. That’s what has me so vocal.

 

[Bryan_k]

Blood - the update broke some things before 6.7 was even deployed. I didn't update to 6.7 yet I still had issues with Saboteurs so that means the servers ultimately control what is going on. I honestly don't know but I do know something is not right. Case in point; EA 105 Base - Trashed it in 90 seconds, yet the EA 80 wiped me out. That makes no sense.

 

[No Angel]

Some things were already broken before the update. Actually, it started happening a few days before the major update patch, when there was a minor update to switch the theme back from Winter.
But that's just a guess; we'll have to wait until everything is fully fixed.

 

[Blood]

Well the servers can send new information to your device at any time then your device would use the new stats. But I honestly have no idea. Without being in the loop I can only speculate. Time will tell. If the troops keep changing its purposeful if they stabilize then it was an accident. I keep bringing up space ape but they were caught on film bragging about manipulating troop and ancient stats to manipulate the players. With the rebalance and museum I would not rule anything out.

 

[NateTheGreat]

Patiently waiting

 

[Manifesto]

Case in point; EA 105 Base - Trashed it in 90 seconds, yet the EA 80 wiped me out. That makes no sense.

To be honest, I haven't noticed anything like some of you have experienced. I'm still defeating all globals, Atomics & CW I choose to attack, but I'm CW lvl262.
Could that be the issue? A lvl156 IA is more likely to be affected by changes in a defender's museum/uni/library stats than a CW lvl 262.
A stronger base might just take me longer to defeat without really registering a difference.

 

[Manifesto]

Blood
You never said ''every attack''. In your previous comment you said ''I just lost 2 planes on a base''.
Firstly, if you only play one game a day that's not enough information to form an opinion.
Second, if you lose two planes on a base that's hardly an indication of anything wrong. Did you examine the base? Were the towers bunched in a row? Did your planes fly over nearby towers? Did SAM missiles hit your planes as well? I lose a plane or two once in a while too, it's hardly a conspiracy.
Now you're saying it's ''every attack for a two day period''. It's hard to validate your comments when you don't tell us ALL the information.

 

[Blood]

Yes manifesto I did 20 attacks before I formed an opinion. My experience coupled with many others is why we believe something is wrong. I have played since before the game even encorporated ww. I know how to judge a base.

 

[Blood]

I’m max Cold War troops and I noticed a difference. Something changed. Not a conspiracy. Someone else hinted at a known bug that allowed museums to be maxed but that would not explain the experience I and others are having.

 

[pckrn]

To be honest, I haven't noticed anything like some of you have experienced. I'm still defeating all globals, Atomics & CW I choose to attack, but I'm CW lvl262.
Could that be the issue? A lvl156 IA is more likely to be affected by changes in a defender's museum/uni/library stats than a CW lvl 262.
A stronger base might just take me longer to defeat without really registering a difference.

in dynasty 1, there arent many players so i find the same bases over and over again. and the exact same base that i have 4 starred numerous times before i get 2 stars after update. and these are CW bases in 290’s so there couldnt have been much room for improvement in their stats.

and last WW we got a really easy opponent and the poor guys simply gave up, only about a third of them using their attacks. and i still lost a HT.

 

[Manifesto]

So you lost a HT. Boo hoo.
Seriously though, did you have a look at why? What level was the base? Was the HT hit by mines? multiple buildings? TC artillery?
Surely a single HT loss is not indicative of something 'amiss'?

 

[Manifesto]

Blood
Fine. You and the 90% of the player base ponder on the mysteries of the last update, I'll keep playing and moving on. And wait for the inevitable fix in a few weeks.
And my pay check, TinSoldier

 

[Blood]

Seriously manifesto you would argue with paint. He said he hit a base he has hit before and had different results.

 

[Blood]

You have Stockholm syndrome. So we are no longer supposed to report bugs and enquirer as to whether or not they are working on them?

 

[Manifesto]

Blood
Is there any scope, in your limited reasoning, that would allow for the possibility that the defender may have changed his base design at any time? Added traps? Researched some things?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing, I'm looking for alternatives instead of blindly blaming something without proper evidence. I don't take things on face value without it.

PS: if paint had the same conviction but lack of tangible evidence as you, be assured I would definitely argue with it!

 

[No Angel]

What are your troops combo Manifesto? Honestly I don't feel my lower age troops been effected. I can only feel the difference when I use global age troops and up.
Planes and factory troop stats are off. I also feel offense coalitions boosts don't apply in world wars.
Maybe, just maybe, if we still use majority barrack troops we don't really feel the difference?
I've switched from all HTs army to cannon-shooter-AH combo temporarily (in world wars)

 

[pckrn]

@manifesto
i have already said i see the same bases over and over. so i can tell when they change their base design, and also there isnt enough time in between my visits to add new traps or research new stuff. and i also already said i am attacking high-cwa so they wouldnt have new traps to add or research to do that they havent already done in the first place.

but its ok. even when i was in empire i had no idea what it was like in dynasty 1 so i cant blame you for trying to apply your gold league logic on me. and also, things might be normal again for me.

 

[Bryan_k]

Hard to say to be certain. I've started watching battles much more closely to try to figure out if there is a pattern. One thing I have noticed is the first wave defender spawn time seems to have reduced considerably in some cases. In fact it was instant on one base; dropped a Saboteur and he was surrounded by defenders from the forest? - I have +11 Enemy Defender spawn time in the museum as well. Not conclusive..

I had commented on the fact something seemed wrong before I even had the update - It started when the victory chest bug appeared?
https://forum.nexonm.com/forum/nexo...and-known-issues/645495-6-7-victory-chest-bug

I'm carrying on regardless as well, though with caution and using the armour blessing more..

 

[No Angel]

Very true, something has gone wrong BEFORE recent update. To be exact, after they removed Winter theme. A week before patch.

 

[NateTheGreat]

Someone mentioned that with the Museum glitch there are many people that might have upgraded their artifacts so we are seeing faster spawning and stronger defenders because of that.....

That being said I'm losing 3,4, 5 elite bazookas with +10% HP artifact, B'gate, and Germans to lv 150-160 bases that I would not lose any previously to those types of bases.