War - Alliance with an 0SH tag in their names.

sileepuppee

Approved user
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
385
Just curious about this add on to alliance names. Our alliance constantly and consistently goes to war though we aren't talking to each other outside of the game since we all have just enough time to log in and fight. War fighting is all we do because really that's the only reason many of us play. We've recently seen the tag 0SH since warring, Romania2016 0SH. I had to look up what the tag meant and alliance followed suit by not adding a troops though we didn't change our name yet since our leader hasn't been on for a while. While we did not add any SH troops, in this 20 vs 20 war, every one of their bases was loaded to the max with troops. Just like the topic of sand bagging, we know that it's touchy but we just felt if your alliance name says it, they should take the high road and not do it regardless of outcome. The glory numbers had them gaining 667 or losing 267 (Something like that). Since my alliance is not part of that community my questions after all that back story is that if there is a spoken/unspoken rule when it comes to fighting an alliance without the 0SH in their name? Is there a gray area depending on the glory numbers? Obviously it can just be a group of douchebags using the name and tricking every opponent into a disadvantage. This whole thing came about to make the war experience better for everyone and not be dominated by p2p. I wanted to ad some ss but the resolution is too high. If they are needed I can add them later. Thanks for any insight.
 

KniferX

Approved user
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
186
0 stronghold donation wars happen only when both teams have the 0SH tag or when both teams make contact and agree to have a 0SH war.

The tag is just used so like-minded alliances (who prefer non-donated strongholds) can easily identify each other.
Since you didn't make any contact with the other team (and since you don't have the 0SH tag) they could only assume that you will fill your strongholds so they filled theirs as well.
If someone breaks the rules of an established 0SH war they'll be put on the blacklist in the 0SH community. This isn't the case here.
 

Muschristian

Approved user
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
196
Look it up... its a bit more complicated than that.

Something like NOT putting any defending Event Troops in the Strongholds and NOT using Elephant Archers for Attacks, but I think everything else in attack is fair game.

OSH alliances also tend to join a group on Discord so if they are double crossed by another "0SH" fake alliance they share all the information between eachother so as to reduce the chances of falling foul to misrepresentation.

Like Knifer said though, OSH alliances are the first to pack everything out when the agreement hasnt been made. They are not OSH fullstop against every enemy.

There are some posts somewhere on this forum with the full details on OSH but I cant find the link.

Mus
British Lions!
British Lions!!
 

Tsamu

Approved user
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
724
Another rule is bazooka towers/sentries must be put on the edge of the map for easy and quick destruction.

And again, only when two 0SH alliances meet in war.
 

Festivus

Approved user
Joined
May 19, 2016
Messages
268
It's actually an accord that alliances join, but it only applies when fighting other alliances that are a part of the 0SH accord. There is a list that's updated daily. There are both Discord and Line app rooms where leaders may meet before war day to discuss terms and address breaches of the accord (for example, one member uses elephant archers in an attack, or someone accidentally fills strongholds without realizing it's a 0SH war).

If you want to join the accord, just ask about it on Discord. If you're not interested and you encounter a 0SH alliance in war, don't assume that they're not going to fill strongholds - they will, and they will attack you with elephant archers, and do whatever it takes to win. It only applies when both sides are 0SH.
 

LordAnubis

Approved user
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
534
0SH original intent was to protest Nexons push for paid troop cards, not so like minded groups can identify each other. I know because I was there in the very begininng of it in a top 50 clan.

Sad they show their hyprocrisy by now using paid troop cards by the bucket load.
 

mkm1g15

Approved user
Joined
Jul 14, 2017
Messages
178
0SH is joke now a days. They're no better than the elephant archer stocking alliances. They seem to turn the tag on and off when they please. Blacklisted in the community? Pfft, that's an absolute gimmick.
When it comes down to tougher wars, I've seen 0sh alliances stock their sh to the brim, even when facing another 0sh alliance.
Agree with Anubis on the protest part, but with a company that has it's accountants calling the shots, it's not possible to ever have a balanced game again.
I personally don't care about these jokers, because sh troops or no sh troops, troop cards are still ruining the gameplay while minting nexon some quick moolah.
 
Top