Recent content by jonggo

TinSoldier - Would be good if you (or someone) can update base stats of all troops after all the nerfing/buffing you've done. Put it in a sticky that can be updated the next time you nerf (the British troops) or buff (the Greeks/Chinese troops). Thanks.

Another useless comment. Stop playing this game for god's sake!

There are worse games out there and they're also not free. No one's forcing you to buy crowns or troop cards. Go out and raid to upgrade your troops (and defenses). Better troops along with the free troop cards helps win your war attack, for as long as you are not a shit attacker. There's too...

Here's my French ARL-44 stats -- 24,024 hp/602 dps, no blessings up. Chivalry from library is +10% health and damage. My uni is only 5/10 on damage, nothing done on health. Domi wiki says 26,254 hp, my alliance mate said the tank he got from me had 26,266 dps (not sure what wonder he has, uni...

Simple, stop feeding the troll to get back on topic..

Not to argue with you about what game is the more direct pre-cursor (obviously PC games preceded mobile games) as well as premium games vs. 'freemium' games. I'm just saying that some of the elements of Civilization PC game are present in the Dominations game and as I'm a fan of strategy games...

Sorry, you seem to have had a bad experience playing the game on the iPad. Works for me though -- both on my iPad Air and Mini. Can't really play on my iPhone after that..

Played the Civilizations PC game which I believe is the pre-cursor to this game. It was a hit then, having had several versions/updates, so hope fans of that game (like myself) will also play this game.

Good for you and your alliance! You fought well in my opinion, but no need to say they were not organized and not good attackers. They got the 100% as expected but fell short of the 150 stars. Let's just see what Nexon comes up with to address your concerns.

Hey Wendy, I know folks are frustrated about this 'strategy' but was there a point to name/shame? And, at the same time, say that they are a joke alliance who placed 67th in the world doing nothing? Would you want your alliance to be called out like that? And then you said you were quite...

I wouldn't want to be your 'dude' either. Don't you see who's bashing who? You even made a new thread, lol!! And oh, if you've searched enough, you'd know that I had this account for quite some time now. I've been lurking in the forums and have been reading about sandbagging that's why I...

Dude, they won more battles (not war) because they had more attacks. And 94% destruction? Did you see that their top 3 only got 29%, 42% and 71%? Maybe they just bashed the low bases time and time again to get higher destruction. Maybe you should let Wendy talk about this instead of speculating...

And your EA/GP is closer :-) Look, everybody sees you're pissed at P1sstakers (pardon the pun) and even called them cheaters just because they put low levels in war. Means all the other alliances, even the top ones are cheaters? You're surely a piece of work!

Just EA/GP? Wendy said in her thread that they got 3 globals (vs. 6) and the same number of IA's. But she was confident that they will defeat them -- just read the thread again which, unfortunately got closed because of an impending Bashfest2016 ;-)

Spaceboy: very simple - how many posts are there in the forum about sandbagging? Why doi i need to add to that and still talk about the other side? Besides one of them already replied in Wendy's post. Then the thread got closed. But boy oh boy, you really have an axe to grind with those fellows!