Recent content by Rollin

@Harlems369th @TheWise @Davis - The Emissary stop ignoring us

This is your „pro“ argument ?? 🤣🤣 i dont play Offensive ? Without my and many others' money, Dominations wouldn't even exist ? Do you think it's a charity ? I expect fairness and good balancing and new stuff. That's what I pay the devs for, that's all and not for that the devs do some shit and...

It's a huge disadvantage for all defensive players and a strong offensive buff ? defensive player, are capped at -85%? Tell me what can i use against them ?? where exactly is the pro ? I have already reached -85% Dmg and HP against mortars, artillery, fighters and bombers and still get destroyed

It won't be a unicorn ? A 2 line artifact is enough to roll the 3rd, and you'll easily be able to get that. 2-3 (1 each artifact) lines means a minimum push of 20-30% (and a maximum of 30-45%) HP AND Dmg right from the start It can only get worse, the luckier you are, the worse and more...

I don't think BHG understands that with the "balancing" patch, they are creating the worst balancing in the history of Dominations and they will hardly be able to reverse it... because it will be almost impossible to balance how do you want to balancing a buff of 15-30% for 1 Artifact ? 2 is...

what a nonsense that can only come from someone who plays in the top 1000 allies I don't know any top ally who hides her museum, and that speaks AGAINST your statement. We'll be able to see it anyway when it starts. 2-3 bombers and 2-3 mortar players are enough to destroy all defensive...

that makes no sense, If you can't defend all attackers, then there's absolutely no point in playing defensively ? For what ? you will be destroyed by any other offensive player, maybe not against bombers but all other tactics will destroy you… you lose either way no matter what you do ?? In a...

"is much stronger" and with the change it will get a lot worse "in a game where you get to attack players" Where exactly does it say that offensive players must be stronger than defensive players ? Both have the same right to exist, one should not be favored over the other... this called...

1. Nobody will want to play Defender anymore because it is unnecessary 2. BHG will never manage to balance it more (At the moment the offensiv is much stronger than the defense, and it will get much worse) 3. there will only be offensive players, which will make the world wars incredibly...

it doesn't matter in the end there are only 2 lines anyway, whether they are right or not there are no 3 or 4 lines except AVs They can believe what they want, it's just not true even if they try to explain it 1000 times WITHOUT PROOF

Was schreibst du für ein Quatsch ? Seek hat es schon richtig geschrieben, alle Defensiv spieler werden mit Domi aufhören oder auf Offensiv wechseln dann stirbt die Defensive einfach komplett aus. Bei Offensiv- und echte Spieler immer noch massiv benachteiligt habe ich aufgehört weiter zu...

I'm shocked that you, as game developers, don't know that a maximum of 2 lines are possible. Awkward

@Harlems369th plz what ? There is no tactic with generals ? Generals have never been the problem, you can ignore them as a defensive player A standard "only" 4 lines war artifact with 15% is better than this mythical ASDIC... and then it should be 3x as expensive as the normal ASDIC ? I don't...

I hear a lot of whining... Fighters and Bombers have super strong legendary artifacts as well as council members, mortars too. The off dominated for several months/years, also through the seasons... (2x Fighter and Bomber seasons) D couldn't do anything about it. If you don't want to spend any...

What a bullshit 🤣🤣 How many legendary artifacts are there for the Off ? how many does the defense have 3 ? maybe 4 with the glove that has shit stats ? council members is maybe balanced O and D how many additional buildings does the Off have ? One additional TT and one Nighthawkhangar with 2...