Search results

A lot of us have been playing this game together since it came out hence the high level bases. Yes we try and search with no sandbags but end up having to adjust roster to find matches otherwise we could let it run for days and find nothing. It is a problem of matchmaking system more than an...

Bowmore like TD said..we would have preferred not to match your team... That was the second war in 60+ wars we added in stackers and that was after searching for hours and hours.. trying every combination from 25-35 with both stackers and no stackers, so if you want to make up some nonsense...

I second this. All we as the community asked for was a stop/limit to the extra troop cards. Please don't implement this pay to win feature and the ridiculous presents again. A couple weeks of those presents and my inventory was completely flooded. If you introduce it again the game may become...

I strongly agree with this post. World War is becoming unplayable. Corrective action has to be taken immediately because as Jakob said the damage has already been done, but it can stop now. It has become impossible to prevent a stalemate, it doesn't matter how good your base is, if someone sends...

Yes, I agree and I mentioned this earlier in the thread. We will have to see how it actually works when it comes out, but I also suspect the top alliances will not be properly represented on the leaderboard due to the lengthy matchmaking process/stalemates.

Fair enough, your attitude here is not the best and you talk like many of us don't understand simple math formulas. We are having a conversation here, but if you want to make it personal and act like my concerns are "self serving" then I am done talking to you on these forums. I am bringing up...

@prodigal clint Alright I get that, but what happens when there is a "JV team" that can constantly run 40v40 wars because I guarantee there are, many of those Korean alliances are very active and have been running large world war matches. They will get the same amount of glory points, will...

Prodigal Clint read your post and I see why you would think that, but let me expand. Sure a higher level alliance may be able to field a 40v40 team, but so can a team full of lower level players. And I can imagine they would have a much better success rate of matching 40v40 down at their level...

So the problem with this new ladder is now lower tier alliances that have the ability to war 24/7 and get matched with unworthy opponents will be represented at the top of the leaderboard instead of the alliances that deserve to be there. I say this because the alliances with higher level...

So just read the new update information regarding war ladders that is soon to be released, I guess Nexon listened to NOTHING we requested or had issues with and completely failed us. It's quite clear the devs don't actually play the game, understand how it works, or understand the underlying...

Right I think moving the generals to castle would be enough and an easy fix

Why should I have to drop medals to play this game lol, it's not addressing the underlying issue...If we annihilate someone's base we should get the loot available..

I think he is saying send them his way since record the battle as proof. I think you guys should have done that too. Then you could post in here.

Right, I finally found a Greek today used some tactics to ensure the 5* and no goods...very frustrating.

Ya, but then people will just start crowning them and it will turn into a who can spend more money rather than who has skill in this game. That and the unlimited crown players that we know are out there have an advantage as well.

I could also see something like a 2 ladder system, A small team ladder (10-20) and a large team ladder (25-40)

Nexon please redo the national goods system, if I 5* an opponent there is absolutely no reason why I should not receive a national trade good as a reward. I propose the following: 5* - 2 trade good reward 4* - 1 trade good 3* - 50% chance at 1 trade good

You bring up some good issues I would say that it would have to start with the current ranking and go from there otherwise it would be too chaotic Regarding the team sizes, it would prolly have to be agreed upon between the two teams with 20 being the minimum and 40 the maximum I would say

Hey folks, it's been a growing problem for top alliances to find war opponents, sometimes searching for 24-48 hours at a time. Also there isn't really a fool proof method to get matched with a particular alliance that would like to battle each other. Nexon stated it is already working on a war...

I could not agree more with most of the comments here, especially philipos. I dropped from 3380 to 3270, no defensive losses in log, no crashes, etc. At +1 medals per battle for 95% of my battles, 110 medals is ALOT. I contacted customer service and they told me to restart my game...Really? You...