Search results

Worst feature ever. Can distract at the worst possible time (war attacks) and provides nothing useful. Seriously, imagine this (since you obviously don't actually game test anything)... You're on your second war attack, there's about 15 minutes left, and it's all tied up. You're attacking from...

and we're back in the war business... our welcome back put us in at 500 pt underdogs, which did not go well, but at least we're back and making progress.

and on day 42... FIXED! hurray! Looking forward to using my new general (Zhukov) for the first time (he's now level 23).

Hurray! they fixed this one. Thank-you.

PM sent (to Leviathan)

Still broken, 33 days now. Got a reply on the customer service chat thing noting that we havent done a war since August. asking if it was still broken and saying that they would be awaiting an update from us. Mind you, I've been posting updates weekly. I'm now switching to daily. Maybe I'll go...

Well, we've hit the one month milestone, and war is still broken for our alliance. It's been over three weeks since we've even heard anything from support.

Broken for three weeks now. We do two wars a week, so we've missed six so far. Multiple tickets submitted. Been awhile since we're heard anything from support.

Haven't had any indication of cheating. Would we be told if that was an issue? Yes, we have a ticket in. War broken for two weeks now and it's been awhile since they've responded to that. I've been playing almost since the game launched and this is the first time I've experienced anything like this.

Since our last war finished (victory), we have not been able to reenter the war screen. Cant review the results, cant start a new one.

The alliance speedup requests need to go away once they are filled (like troop requests). The endless spam makes the alliance chat even more useless than normal.

We're not talking about new players here. You're absolutely supposed to let new players in. The example I posted above is pretty obviously not new players. We're talking about 8 nearly identical accounts. They all have the absolute minimum buildings needed to participate in wars. Not a single...

So, what's the most extreme version of sandbagging that you've seen? Thought it might be fun to have a place to document them... For my first entry I'll go with my current war. We're matched up against Danger! (that's the top player's name, I can't read the alliance name). Danger! is level 292...

In what way would that version of things be worse that what we have now? Yes, the extreme case would be an alliance team made up of 50 similarly leveled accounts. How is an alliance made up of similarly experienced players bad? How is that worse than the current situation where the extreme case...

I could fix the sandbagging issue with literally one line of code (well, it depends on how their current code is written, best case is one line of code changing the loop controlling the mechanism where they consider each member of the alliance). Right now, when they are calculating the overall...

Ahh yes, going back and rereading the announcement I understand now, though I am perplexed, an event where everybody wins seems a bit odd. Guess that's what makes it 'truly unique.'

I wouldn't count on any ghost drops. The event says it will track progress, but the only tangible thing I've seen so far is the "10 stars = 1 pt" bit... which is completely insane. If that's the only way to actually get points for the event, then it is simply impossible. Correct me if I'm wrong...

Loved the 600 ruby troop chests... they were the only thing I used to spend rubies on...

no, not 'expecting a bunch of free stuff'... just some clue about the likelihood of getting anything even remotely useful.

Great concept, and I agree that adding chests to the traveling salesman has taken him out of the category of 'completely useless.' However, I do have some complaints. The main one being that without some indication of what the drop percentages are for the various prizes, I'm starting to wonder...