ww matchmaking system?

B like Big Bug

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
94
Our team composition includes one or two eras of space, 3 eras, and the rest is global, industrial and classical, and sometimes an epoch. Our opponents mostly had one or two digital ones, which we always said was normal. How many times our opponents are part of Top alliances. For example, in last ww, 6 digital ages full against 2 age of our space. Or the previous comparison of 3 digital ages against one or two ages of our space. Our glory is about 16 thousand. Does it work for top alliances and strong VIPs? If you put us in this game where the stadium is not empty of spectators, at least tell us to start only once every 48 hours and do nothing until the next two days. In this game, which is an excuse anyway , The lost glory of the VIP alliances will be returned to them. But recently I think they will find a new way and put in our heads to enjoy and get a simple win and be encouraged to spend more. I do not think this is our only problem. And I have seen many times that the system is terribly detrimental to unprofitable Alliances.
we just have 2 space age and some atomic and global and industrial and classical (with one iron we are 10).do you suggest we must leave the game?
I think now i undrestand why a some Alliances have iron age that hit DA.Be sure to get tired and frustrated
 

B like Big Bug

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
94
we lost near 10 days of world war chest event,without any chance(even 1%) for win.we have a very good player. skillful players.but ,we can't win in same this wars even we have 10 old Eisenhower in any attack.
does anyone has any idea or guid.my players gone to inactive.
 

atom3

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
94
Maybe there isn't many sub digital aliances that do wars. Personally the fewest I've seen is 4 digital age players out of 10. My alliance also has 4 digital age bases. So as you can see, we were never on the higher side of player levels, always on the loosing one. Our winrate is maybe 45%. The reason for me is that game lacks gameplay updates, none at all since the introduction of WW 5 yeas ago, every update now is just more upgrades and pay to win offers. So I don't think new players are joining nowdays, if someone joins by mistake, they will give up 1-2 weeks in it because they have no chance to catch up and theres not that much you can do in the game anyway. You have WW and multiplayer battles, they are the same more or less and thats it.
 
Last edited:

Wicked Lord

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2018
Messages
57
B like Big Bug the algorithem, doesnt look at the ages. All what matters is your war weight. Its important not to max out every age. For the most part its better to max offense and then rush to the next age. A few defensive maxers are ok but not an whole alliance (Well I dont really know your alliance but often this is the problem).

Btw for the most time we only war with 2 digital players and doing quite well (Glory around 20k). Without premium TT and Eisenhower shit.
 
Top