Search results

Is that sarcasm? It certainly is not becoming more fun and I'm tired of nerfs

+1 for BambooCoc's vids. He does a great job.

Will is crying because he needs someone to "stand by me". I think that was the name of that movie anyway.

Vroom vroom! Was that professional enough?! Lol! Wait I need to add some kissy symbols, or is that to yellow page add like????

Already done ;) Vie la liberte! (I'm not French could be misspelled)

Remember you asked if we feel they are OP the no nerf comments answer that in the games current state. So what happened to the thread, it was deleted now reposted? Please don't say accident, your last comment shows that is not possible. We want the game to improve. Our ideas, which were on topic...

Those comments already exist. To recap. No more nerfs fix the dang hampster in a maze stupid AI

The word planning used here means implied that's why it was phrased as a question, it is a reasonable question at that due to the games crazy amount of nerf history

Maggie is right. When a pattern emerges in play and is then suddenly discussed in the forums, the obvious is what has happened in the past. Remember the old saying hindsight is 20/20. The point is that the majority of players find BHG's nerf solution to make the game less fun

I agree. If they are trying to achieve balance they are taking the troops in the wrong direction.

I'd say repost if a nerf comes out and none of the real issues get addressed. I've screen captured all these posts for just such an instance. That way if this kind of behaviour escalates, and someone gets banned there is always Facebook to post what went on here. Still having no response from...

The investor (player) does post ideas in the futures section but it's like DBuk said, it is likely BHG ignores the suggestions in the ideas section or they wouldn't have implied an upcoming nerf that failed to address the concerns posted. Let alone remove said thread when that became apparent...

That would only show that our liking the game or not doesn't matter to them as long as they can make it 'seem' like they are making improvements in the interests of our enjoyment in order to continually attract new players, while disregarding veteran players by manipulating the internet...

Well sarcasm aside there is one way to find out if it was an accident... Start the topic of BHG suggesting/implying another nerf and see if it disappears again.

Yup noticed that. I'd like to know why they won't consider our input fairly by letting everyone's opinion be known so all can read. Nothing will improve by hiding of our conversations to try and convince people there is no elephant in the room. That kind of reaction is very disappointing and...

It's not called paranoid when the comments coming in are all negative concerning another nerf. Maybe BHG will actually give a crap what we think and fix the AI, rally, and retarded number of maxed bases that were there 2days after IA released. No one believes anyone is stupid enough to pay that...

Only different in your eyes bud. Trouble with your view is that you just don't get that it is everyone else who decides if you are spamming or not. Not you. You got quite a few number of people not liking your comments already? You trying to break your own record.

Definitely rude. Must think no one deserves a right to vent there frustrations. I for one don't consider this spam at all.

I find it funny that the developers believe they have a balanced soldier field when the part that made the game really fun (attacking) has become boring. If they think they balanced the HC maybe they should take a look at the average army being used right now. When are they going to realize...

Players don't have experience then red prince?! Why do people like you feed a line of BS when we could improve the game with accurate feed back. Point. The rally function has been broken from the start but has actually gotten a lot worse even to the point of causing you to lose battles due to...