Cheater did get rolled back

Quali

Approved user
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
230
So in our current war vs a top 100 alliance, one of the bases had an IA library but had command chapter 3 showing - 3 generals on defense. I reported it and the base was rolled back 10 levels and had 2 generals showing on war day. Something also happened to a much higher base - got rolled back 40 levels.

I just wanted to let folks know that BHG did well on this one. We don't get the feedback from CS on what gets done and I had little expectation on this one even though it had to be wrong. Way to go CS. Not often I can say that.
 

Pepyto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
182
Yes, that 3generals dude is obvious cheater(must be carried away while using hacks) so they probably checked other players as well... they should punish whole alliance reducing 1 level to alliance experience...
and they should ban his ip address if possible, so he couldn't install this game ever again. Its obvious he is non profitable cheater, so useless for Nexon.
​​​​P.s. he will cheat again for sure if left in game
 

LordJestix

Approved user
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
805
Yes, that 3generals dude is obvious cheater(must be carried away while using hacks) so they probably checked other players as well... they should punish whole alliance reducing 1 level to alliance experience...
and they should ban his ip address if possible, so he couldn't install this game ever again. Its obvious he is non profitable cheater, so useless for Nexon.
​​​​P.s. he will cheat again for sure if left in game

my thoughts on roll backs vs bans, is that they can see the active player base and unique players, and those numbers arent that great. So instead of banning they roll back so they still have players in the game.
 

Pepyto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
182
They can do whatever they like, but we are talking about 2 players in top 100 alliance, it's so obvious there are cheaters " on every step " in this game, and this thing is getting out of hand...
 

LordJestix

Approved user
Joined
May 12, 2017
Messages
805
They can do whatever they like, but we are talking about 2 players in top 100 alliance, it's so obvious there are cheaters " on every step " in this game, and this thing is getting out of hand...

i dont disagree with you, im just stating why i think it happens the way they are doing it.
 

K1ng_kriting

Approved user
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
70
maybe they afraid of loosing some player or their system very low.
too many problem in this game.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
I disagree they did well. They should be banned, not rolled back.
At the very least cheaters should be rolled back and then banned for a few days.
And maybe get a penalty of 5million food and gold plus 5k oil as well.
 

melheor

Approved user
Joined
Sep 18, 2017
Messages
289
Better yet, use these players as monetization strategy, have them buy their accounts back after the ban, with a starting price of $1 and doubling with each age.
 

Mountainking

Approved user
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
767
These rollbacks should be at least 1/4 of their total level gained in terms of defenses/offenses/economic upgraded and a 1 month ban. Then on a second time, permanent ban.
 

Quali

Approved user
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
230
Based on the lack of attacking in the war from these I suspect a ban hammer might have been dropped too.
 

Bobortvogel

Approved user
Joined
Dec 5, 2015
Messages
168
Thanks for sharing. It's good to know they do take action against cheaters. I don't understand why they maintain secrecy on this issue. It seems a little visibility would go a long way with players.
 
Top