That would suggest everyone in the top 10 needs to have the same mix of players (basically all 300+ space age accounts) which is just plain rediculous @domas.
I reckon you should have a quick think about what you are saying before splurging. Just a suggestion.
Being competitive means being able to beat alliances of roughly the same size/weight.
It isn't a competition to see who has the biggest bases, but rather who has the better pound-for-pound players.
Any old bunch of numpties could be top of the board if all you need is 20/30 maxed bases, and therefore mismatches every war.
Well, you want to fight wind mills like Don Quijote. Have fun. That’s not how the game and the Top 10/20/50 works. If you wan it your way you need different leagues with different rules.
Other way round: your way of doing it results mostly in much weaker opponents and low glory. That’s why you have reached top 10. it’s Not Bad if you are matched with a few tougher alliances now.
Same here our highest player is atomic, last few wars we didn't had atleast one SA as our opponent. Current war 3 atomic age vs 2 sa and one cold war. War and alliance killer..