my group had to abandon the alliance and make a new one, because the 'leader' stopped playing without moving authority.
no problem, we moved everyone over to a new alliance and we are happy.
however, the old vestigial alliance collects people that we want because it's name/language are for our specific city... ppl we want in our group are going to the old alliance.
so, i visit it every few month and tell the same story in chat.
interestingly, the old group now has no 'leader', 'co-leader', or 'council' at all, everyone is "ally" which seems to be a mistaken use-case; a state that should not exist.
i suggest that every alliance should have a 'leader' because otherwise it can't function; if there is none someone should be auto-promoted.
if a leader has not logged in a month, co-leaders should have the ability to claim 'leader'.
if this logic were in effect we would not have needed to abandon the old group, and this dissonant state would not happen.
also, leaders should be able to 'disband' alliances and/or change their names (if these are not already features).
no problem, we moved everyone over to a new alliance and we are happy.
however, the old vestigial alliance collects people that we want because it's name/language are for our specific city... ppl we want in our group are going to the old alliance.
so, i visit it every few month and tell the same story in chat.
interestingly, the old group now has no 'leader', 'co-leader', or 'council' at all, everyone is "ally" which seems to be a mistaken use-case; a state that should not exist.
i suggest that every alliance should have a 'leader' because otherwise it can't function; if there is none someone should be auto-promoted.
if a leader has not logged in a month, co-leaders should have the ability to claim 'leader'.
if this logic were in effect we would not have needed to abandon the old group, and this dissonant state would not happen.
also, leaders should be able to 'disband' alliances and/or change their names (if these are not already features).
