We want WW to be fair

[Kam1983]

In many games including clash of clans and Vainglory, skill is only thing that matters during battles (obviously, troops level matters as well).

In Dominations, I can buy armies and use them in WW. So, if I m not skillful, I can pay real money to buy extra armies and tactics. How s that fair?
Stop these nonsense army sales.

 

[Stonehawk]

Agreed! We pay to advance more quickly- Keep wars about skill!

 

[Skilladilla]

They can also make matchmaking more fair. We are now in war against some chinese alliance, no sandbag neither them or us, but their 12th ranked player is higher level than our first ranked player, so not quite a fair fight..also glory we get for win is 277 and if we lose war (and we will ) we lose 877 glory, real nonsense

 

[K1ng_kriting]

this gonna be sad world war,without cash youre team have to play really really hard and the result is not too good. BHG/NEXON please stop it.

 

[Green Master]

Nexon need to earn money, and nobody will buy troops for mp fights. So maybe a limitation of additional troops would be acceptable for both sides.
And if you want to play for free you have to accept that you are beaten by pay-gamer - that's everywhere the same. Invest time or money or both
But Dominations is cheap compared to other games.

 

[Kam1983]

No I don't accept that. That s not the way to profit. I agree to be beaten by pay to win players in advancing the game but not in WW.
These nonsense army sales are no different than sandbagging.

 

[Brand Marrow]

yes, having pay to play leak into world wars is mucho sucky! ruining skill based victory! Not a good long term strategy to earn Nexon money as people will leave to play games that dont require cash to win...

 

[Bowmore]

correction: people who don't spend money will leave to play games that don't require cash to win

 

[Brand Marrow]

not true, casual spenders will leave... and app profits are driven primarily by casual purchase, not by dedicated spenders...

 

[snowleopard]

Yes, the another reason why sandbagging is prevalent is because of Mismatching. I saw my alliance match with way harder alliance despite us and the other alliance not using the sandbags. This makes us use sandbag more time than not.

 

[Kam1983]

Cheers everyone. Happy to see many players on board

 

[DaZTroYeR]

I think 99.9 pct of people agree with you.. and the only person besides developers that dont is probaly the crown prince of dubai if he play lol...

 

[QuébecGlory]

If you can buy your way up from medieval to atomic in 2 days, good for you, because you'll end up playing against other atomic players, in theory

But if you entire alliance can fill the Stronghold building with bought troops, like right now, where a low industrial can clean an decent atomic without any problem due to the equivalent of 10 full armies...it's ridiculous. But like in the case of sandbagging where alliances complaining could just start sandbagging also to avoid the problem, I guess BHG allows troops to be bought, and I don't blame the players using this tactic. BHG has to fix to problems themselves before everybody just quits playing the game...

 

[Kam1983]

It s clearly against the fair play. Me and many war focused players will eventually quit the game (sooner than one may think).

 

[Brand Marrow]

yup, likely to ruin war for most players, brilliant move Nexon!

 

[Bowmore]

The Alliances that have a win-at-all-costs approach to this game already aren't playing fair, so why does this matter ?

 

[Kam1983]

I understand if an alliance wants to win at any cost but don't understand why BHG/Nexon have been promoting unfair play.

 

[SebQuattro]

I can see some of the heavier spenders getting fed up with the stronghold too. If you've got a couple of spenders in your alliance, all of the donations to the stronghold are going to be put on them. I would imagine they'll eventually get fed up carrying their alliance, especially as the odds are the tactic troop donations won't be reciprocated.

Unfortunately there's one very simple solution to the stronghold, NTG's and sandbagging: Opt out of war.

 

[France Solidaire]

Suis pour pétition pour wars juste et stop au petit compte inactif qui font baisser en score total et qui déséquilibre les wars beaucoup de joueurs ont laissez tomber le jeu à cause du manque de réactivité de nexonn pour les wars et toujours pas de replay !
Ce n’est pas motivant de perdre car en face ont grâce a 5 petit compte force de frappe largement supérieur tout le monde n a pas un emir dans son alliance le fric pourit tout meme danss les jeu lamentable
joint french mojito sans emir



Am for petition for wars just and stop at the small account inactive which lower in total score and which imbalances the wars many players have dropped the game because of the lack of reactivity of nexonn for the wars and still no replay! It is not motivating to lose because in front have have thanks to 5 little account of greatly superior strike force everyone does not have an emir in his alliance the money all the same in the game lamentable

 

[QuébecGlory]

We just beat an alliance you had 7 inactive iron age/classical accounts. It's possible to beat sandbagging, don't throw in the towel right off the bat. Adjust your team composition and fight hard.