World War with 40 participants

[kuergan]

Hello,
I see it is possible to run wars with 10, 20, 30 and 50 participants. Why not 40?
Some alliances have 40, 45 players available for war. Which causes several players to be kept out of war. Some of them even left alliance because wanted to be more active on wars.

That would be highly appreciated.

If you are reading it an like it, please vote.

 

[Theserver]

Several years ago there were 40 wars. At the time, they were removed to condense teams in the remaining sizes to improve war matches.

Whether this needs revisited, I have no authority to say.

 

[Morris]

I believe 40vs40 wars should be brought back it is almost impossible to have 100% unless u use fill in that do nothing but fill . Either 40 wars or allow more members

 

[LordWayne]

BIG HUGE GAMES, PLEASE HELP US PLAY BIG HUGE GAMES!

Our alliance (Enterprize) has been running back to back 30 vs 30 wars since July / August of last year. We are continually running in to challenges where we have to rotate players in / out so that everyone can share the experience of World War.

There is too big of a gap between 30 vs 30 and 50 vs 50 (which face it... 50 vs 50s only occur about once a year and contain players from multiple different alliances.)

Please help us bridge the difference and bring 40 vs 40 battles to life!

 

[Boroda81]

От лица Альянса, полностью согласен с предыдущими сообщениями, прошу добавить возможность проводить битвы 40 на 40

 

[Sega]

I don't participate in World Wars yet, but I think the gap of 10, 20, 30 ... 50 is somehow illogical.
I vote “+” at least to see whether BHG does at least something for the players or not.