Search results

Can you post his stats at level 40?

It's unacceptable the account wasn't banned.

Agree with HK... Finally someone with some sense

This thread just shows how hard It is to get matched. If you're in a more advanced alliance it can take over a day to get matched. We've been searching for over 12 hours and this is a regular occurrence. it shouldn't be so difficult to play this game

I think there is value to HTs too... even if you have French tanks.

yup. 4 mortars in industrial only (after library research)

open up competition. let all teams face each other... Then the team w/ the most wins deserves to be on the leaderboard. Until then, its not a true leaderboard.

resort to name calling.... but if the team w/ the most wins, doesn't actually play against the same competition then your'e comparing apples to oranges. You obviously don't get it. I'd love to battle against you, but unfortunately the proposed system prob doesn't allow for it. Respond to the...

The majority of us play the game because we like to compete. It is a war strategy game after all... and competition in itself leads to a winner and loser. If you’re saying the “best” team doesn’t necessarily win most of the time, then war in itself in this game is absolutely pointless. Your...

For those saying let the system play out…. There is no point when the logic is flawed from the beginning. Anytime someone that is not the actual best war team has an opportunity to be on the leaderboard, the system is flawed. The current proposed system allows someone to theoretically gain...

Wmmumm, global, lvl 160

Thanks. That's what I figured, but someone awhile back said they did. I was skeptical

The question is if it suppresses attacking troops like machine gun units do. Suppress as in reduce damage and speed of troops.

In reply to certain posters above. Forums are meant to foster open and free discussions of key topics. The original post simply points what what a leaderboard is and what it is meant to achieve (to display the best teams in a ranking order, without any handicaps). It is a key topic that is...

A leaderboard is meant to rank who is actually best. The proposed WW Leadboard falls short of this, due to matchmaking being based on a teams upgrade level. The simple fact that there is even a chance that low level alliances have an opportunity to be on top of the leaderboard, yet are...

Do Machine Guns (Redoubt Level 3) buildings suppress troop movement and damage? If they do, is it only at Level 3 and above? And is it all troops, or just infantry?

In the case where it's a team full of global accts is matched vs gunpowder players... Then the global team should win. What's wrong with that? They are the better team and should win unless the gunpowder team is just extremely skilled and the global team really sucks If the gunpowder team has a...

the point of an elo ranking is just that, a ranking. If you're shielding certain teams from matching up w/ other teams by limiting matchmaking to similarly upgraded teams, then there is no point to this entire game. There's an opportunity to game the system and move up the proposed ladder by...

What bsharpy says is correct. If matchmaking is based on a teams XP level, there is absolutely no incentive to build up bases. There's suppose to be an an advantage to have higher level bases, the proposed system doesn't make sense... What exactly is the point in having an elo rating system if...

Elo ratings are used as a rating of a players/teams skill and overall effectiveness. Why then (based on the latest announcement) is matchmaking still based on a teams upgrades? That makes no sense... If someone has a high rating they should take on all teams regardless of their upgrade level...