0 sh

[Mcnasty]

Ive also said that I’m not osh and don’t fill sh. You are osh and do fill sh. See what I’m getting at. 10% of the non osh teams I’ve been against have filled their sh. 90% of the osh teams I’ve been against do. Osh teams fill sh more then anyone.

 

[Mcnasty]

A lot of alliances don’t know your rules and see 0sh and honour it because they are honest teams only to find out that the 0sh team is stacked full of sh troops. It’s flawed. They don’t know they need to contact the 0sh team they think you don’t use sh troops when in fact you do. Having osh in your name just tricks teams that don’t know your “rules”

 

[Quali]

I'm not 0SH either, but I at least understand what it is. If a team is 0SH they are likely playing more competitively anyway, so it is less surprising they would fill if it made sense to.

Joining 0SH, or not, is a decision for that team. But if you choose not to they are under no obligation to not fill every war. It would seem a little silly to assume every team they meet will understand what it means and also choose not to fill.

 

[Centurion96]

Please, do not blame 0SH movement, without even knowing how it works!

1. 0SH rules apply only when the both opponents are fully registered 0SH members.
2. There is a special group on Line and Discord where the members are managed (including black listed fake 0SH alliances).
3. Members should communicate before the war to agree about the rules (0SH/2TT/0TT).

 

[Centurion96]

Why? If you are not 0SH member than just ignore it. Or do you also expect from an alliance with name >Losers< to actually lose the war?

 

[Centurion96]

And they are the most honest teams out there, that's for sure. We are one of them. There are too many cheaters and spenders in this game, so 0SH is a logical step. I'm sorry that you are lacking information about 0SH, but please be honest, who beside you should search for the information?

 

[Mcnasty]

I get that osh has its rules but only people that are part of it or that come on the forums know what 0sh rules are. So there’s a large amount of the player base that doesn’t and only kno that 0sh means 0 stronghold troops which implies to them that you don’t fill strongholds when in fact you do. Which in turn gives all that have 0sh in its name a bad name. It needs to be changed cause the ones that only know it means no stronghold troops see it and a lot of them are honest and think you aren’t using them so they don’t either. You have to be part of a group so why not just name it something for that group. Just not something that implies something that you’re not

 

[Mcnasty]

I get that osh has its rules but only people that are part of it or that come on the forums know what 0sh rules are. So there’s a large amount of the player base that doesn’t and only kno that 0sh means 0 stronghold troops which implies to them that you don’t fill strongholds when in fact you do. Which in turn gives all that have 0sh in its name a bad name. It needs to be changed cause the ones that only know it means no stronghold troops see it and a lot of them are honest and think you aren’t using them so they don’t either. You have to be part of a group so why not just name it something for that group. Just not something that implies something that you’re not

 

[Mat 3 BloodyBarons]

We lost this team was really good, and thanks for your comment. It was a close WW.

 

[Mcnasty]

Were you outmatched

 

[No Angel]

Centurion96, yup! I expect them to lose, of course! what a perfect analogy

 

[sileepuppee]

It's been said many times over already but I asked the same thing months ago but more as a query rather. If your alliance doesn't have 0SH in the name as well than there's no reason the other side has to do it. But yeah the 0SH has their own community as well as discord I believe.

 

[No Angel]

I am vegan, but I still drink milk! Oh wait, I'm vegan only if I date a vegan guy!

 

[sileepuppee]

The first time anyone goes up against an 0SH alliance they are always going to run into the problem listed above. That's how my alliance first experienced it. I read up on what it meant and I assumed as well there would be no troops. Than I posted on this forum and got my answer when there were actual troops in there. We were really upset at first like everyone would be the first time but after getting responses from the forums we realized that it was because we didn't understand the full situation and now we do. In 0SH v 0SH all the rules apply and other than that, they don't. I've seen some fights where both teams agreed to not use troop cards in battle either but that's not what 0SH means. It only applies to to defense. I know alliances get screwed over in glory because of misunderstandings, scamming, and flat out bsing by the other side but that's the chance you take. After the first time we just assume there's always troops in there so we no longer have any issues. I get people don't want to add the 0SH into their names (Which we won't) but without that, all alliances are fair game. That's the plane and simple of it. It's not about having faith in someone else as it's just a game. If both alliances are 0SH and one uses troop cards, than they get blacklisted.

 

[sileepuppee]

Sounds like your alliance is 0SH. You're only vegan when you're with that guy. And technically as long as that milk isn't from an animal you're still a vegan (Almond milk, etc).

 

[No Angel]

Nah, just sarcasm

 

[Skilladilla]

Mcnasty, yes 0SH is a group, and we need it in name or motto because there are a lot of alliances that are 0SH,it is easier to check name and motto when you get matched against some alliance than to quit game, and read lot of text so you can find if that alliance is 0SH or not.. Also there are moments when 0SH alliance removes 0SH for a week mostly because they had lots of EA stables activated due to previous hard war, so if they don't want to waste stables they erase 0SH tag for a week and put it back when certain event buildings expire.. You should get some informations before spreading hate, i hope you are a bit closer to question why 0SH alliances have that tag in name ot motto.. You should also know that many alliances have troop card bug that is present for a year or more, so they don't lose any cards they donate to strongholds whether it's F.H or EA and that is the reason some alliances joined 0SH initiative, not to mention that EA are overpowered.. Peace

 

[Tower]

Geezers.. so much ignorant complaining

Viking Army is 0TT. But we only do 0TT if and only if we can make contact with the oponent early on planning day and make sure both parties agree and understand what it is about.

We recently had two 0TT wars only a week a apart both against teams that are not 0SH/0TT, but we made contact and came to an agreement. Both wars were 30/30, i.e 60 attacks. Both wars had 2 mistakes (attacker used TT) that were perfectly solved and compensated for by the oponent.

If we cannot make contact early on planning day - expect to face elephants in some if not all SH

0TT is the most fun wars. It is the only wars where skill really matters.
If you go full TT and bring 4 elephant cards you got to be a complete noob not to 5* any base of the same age as yours and most of the time 1-2 ages above yourself. No skill required.

 

[ratata]

Mcnasty So you expect an 0SH alliance to leave SH empty in every war? You realise that would be a joke, right?
We have 3 type of alliances in this game:
- Those that aren't part of anything and do whatever they want
- 0SH (the official members, not those that just put it in their names: They respect the 0SH rules whenever meeting another 0SH alliance and do so by checking an official list.
- 0TT --> Same as 0SH

Whenever we matchup for a war, I always try to find a contact to confirm the rules when meeting an 0SH or 0TT alliance and even when facing a 'normal' alliance, I will try to reach out.
As Tower mentioned as well, I can only confirm 0TT are by far the most fun wars.

 

[Mcnasty]

Did you even read my comments before you went on your rant about ignorant complaining? 75% of the alliances in this game don’t know your rules and only know that 0sh stands for 0 stronghold troops. But I think that’s why you use it in your name so that the ones that don’t know the rules think you don’t use them when in fact you only don’t use them if it’s another 0sh team then you stack your strongholds when you’re against normal alliances. You keep defending telling me the rules but you’re not getting my point. So really who’s the one that’s ignorant. Take 0sh out of your name and change it to something that doesn’t imply you’re something that you’re not. Some teams see it and think you don’t use them and they respect that because they don’t know your rules when normally they would use sh troops they don’t against osh teams thinking they don’t use them either when in fact you do so it gives the osh team the advantage but I guess that’s what you want. You want the ones that don’t know your rules to think you never use them so you can have that advantage. Osh teams stack their strongholds more the any normal alliances cause obviously you can’t win against normal alliances without them. I don’t stack my alliances strongholds cause we don’t need too but from my experience against osh teams they do need too. Just because you have a set of rules doesn’t mean that all the player base knows that there’s rules to it. Do you get it now? Or do I need to say it again? If the whole player base knew your rules then there wouldn’t be a problem but they don’t and you use that to trick normal alliances that don’t know the rules that think you don’t use them because your name states that you don’t.