Airplanes should be able to defend

[Peter Weidemann]

Airplanes should be able to defend, antiaircraft should also be able yo be used against tanks

 

[LordStark263AC]

Let's make it even more defensive.... great idea.

 

[Mcnasty]

No. Enough with the defensive buffs. Seriously terrible idea. They already f**ked attacking with the rebalance. We don’t need more defences. Just build a better base

 

[albynos]

in my opinion the idea itself is not bad. Mcnasty, I don't know whicl lv you are in I'm constantly attacked by lv 250+ with 5 Supersonic jets and believe me or not it is impossible to defend. I know that the game is based on the attacks and not on the defenses, but in my opinion there should be some more air defense. F.i. planes can defend only against other planes...or better they are deployed only in case the opponent strikes with planes. Troops are affected only in case they are within the shoothing range of the plane.

 

[Saruman the White]

I disagree.

 

[Mcnasty]

Build a better base. Upgrade your defences. The idea itself is bad. The game doesn’t need to change your defence does.

 

[pckrn]

5 CWA fighters die like flies if you upgrade your sam, airdefense, and towers to ATOMIC level

 

[albynos]

Mcnasty you seems to be a bit frustrated. Find a wife, do your things and then come back.

pckrn I agree with you, but you know better than me that it is not easy to fully upgrade all above to the atomic lvl in terms of time (without speed ups and/or crowns). I'm working on it.

As already mentioned in other posts, the true issue is that the CWA army is too strong for the Atomic defenses even if fully upgraded. Heavy tanks and artillery mixed up with some tactics (protect and health) are immortals.

 

[pckrn]

but an army of a higher age being too strong for the non-maxed lower age is true for all ages, not just cwa/atomic, and i believe they should be.

 

[Manifesto]

Really pckrn ?
Maybe people need stronger fly spray because my fighters rarely die.

 

[pckrn]

Manifesto didnt you say you left 1800 to play in 400 medals? people in that medal range try to kill flys by throwing the spray can at them. in 3400 people do know how to use the sprays

 

[FroggyKilla]

Can I ask why you felt the need to take a jab at McNasty’s personal life? It’s not making your argument look any better.

 

[Manifesto]

pckrn , l wasn't aware you took that much interest in what l say. Besides, medal droppers and raiders dont give me time to enjoy the lower leagues, I'm usually back up to 1800ish every few days.
Regardless, first you said 'upgraded' defenses, now you're saying 'using' them. Two different arguments. And Atomic or CW defenses are what they are no matter where you find them.
Perhaps people need to change how they use planes, after these rebalances?

 

[pckrn]

Manifesto that comment was in the bottom of the first page of a mega thread so i always saw it before clicking on the last page to jump to lol

anyway, ‘using’ defenses is a given. if the defenses were what they are no matter where you found them, why bother with placement?

a well placed lvl1 missile silo is much more effective than a poorly placed lvl4 missile silo. but if we were to talk about the dangers of the missile silo, we would all assume to be talking about the well placed one. ‘well-placed’ can be omitted for most people. but i guess you’re not like most people, so here:

well-placed lvl5 sams + well-placed lvl11 towers + well-placed lvl4 antiair can kill easily supersonic fighters even if they are of a lower age.

 

[Manifesto]

''well-placed lvl5 sams + well-placed lvl11 towers + well-placed lvl4 antiair can kill easily supersonic fighters''
Exactly why planes should be used in conjunction with a good army combo, rarely as a main attack.
Unless it's to take out a silo.

 

[Manifesto]

If defending troops come from select buildings then the planes should obviously come from the hangar, yes?
No problem, first destroy the hangar with ground troops, problem solved.
Then is it worth protecting the hangar behind walls?

 

[Bootney Lee Fonsworth]

So you want to cough up additional oil to replace defending planes that were destroyed after every attack? I assume this defense would have to be set up like bunkers afterall.

 

[No Angel]

I don't understand. Should airplanes, or air defense that should be able to shoot on tanks on defense Peter Weidemann ?

Anyways, I once suggested if airplanes could be donated. I guess it would work both way, defending and attacking. On the attacking side that would be super awesome

 

[Mcnasty]

Don’t worry albynos I got me a smoking hot wife. I’m not frustrated at all cause I can build a well defended base and don’t need the defensive buffs to protect my shit. I’m global and defend against cwa attacks. It’s not what you got it’s how you use it. Adding planes on defence would mean you’d need a troop to take them out and that would just add to the list of things you need to put out or your your shooters would have to shoot at them which would be useless so then you’d have planes taking out all you troops in a couple of sweeps. Attacking would become almost impossible. They’ve buffed defences and have added more defences and if you can’t protect your base with that then you’re a lost cause. I would expect a stronger higher age player to take out the lower guy but if you build a good base then you can defend against them. Are you taking a jab at my personal life because you have to take your frustrations out on the palmela sisters? Or is it that you bought the wrong type of peanut butter and your dog won’t go near you anymore? Don’t worry you’ll find someone one day and maybe you won’t have to carry bacon in your pockets to keep her. In your case I’d keep the bacon just in case.