August State of the Nations

[Imaera]

dominations is just a .. boring grindfull p2w stupit buggy game now adays..

Not for me, it's not! Ok, it has it's problems, i get angry, i get frustrated, i complain a lot! But i'm still here and so are you! That means the game is not as bad as you make it sound.
Why don't you wait and see how these new features will be and then we can all complain together, knowing what we are crying about?
As i see it, lately the devs started to partly listen to the community. See demolition, bazooka tower, stalemate issue, dock, NTG's, tactical helicopter, matchmaking, they are trying to adress sandbagging, and probably more, but that's what came to my mind wiyhout thinking too long. P2W will always be there, cause they need to pay bills. If this new building will be an issue, it will be sorted out.

 

[Manifesto]

Htmk5 , when people come on here saying things like ''brits are OP, they killed my castle without activating my generals'' or ''brits are OP and stole all my rss'' it's called complaining.
If they gave a valid set of statistics that can PROVE the brits are OP, THAT's facts.

 

[Tsamu]

The recent changes to daily dock bonus to include national trade goods (NTGs), and the increased chance of earning them in battle, has made the United Nations wonder power of 3 random NTGs per day pointless. And with the next update we get an extra NTG if we earn one in battle. I think it only fair that you adjust the wonder power to give us 3 of our least plentiful resources, rather than random. Or change the power to rebalancing our NTGs, replacing those that are maxed with some that are in short supply.

 

[Manifesto]

Why look at the wonder as being pointless, why not look at it as being a bonus?

 

[Thevinegru]

It's going to target the largest grouping of attacking troops so it's splash damage.

 

[Thevinegru]

Sounds like the missile silo will like to attack tanks primarily since they have the highest highpoints. I guess the British archer spammers will have to start using these again which is great in my opinion.

It said it's targeting the largest grouping of troops. I would guess that means the guys behind the tanks but my guess is as good as yours.

 

[Manifesto]

Sounds like the missile silo will like to attack tanks primarily since they have the highest highpoints. I guess the British archer spammers will have to start using these again which is great in my opinion.

It said it's targeting the largest grouping of troops. I would guess that means the guys behind the tanks but my guess is as good as yours.

It actually says the ''biggest cluster of hitpoints'' but hopefully it will be a fairly large amount of hitpoints, which as ReekyBullet said might encourage Brit spammers to use tanks.

 

[Tsamu]

Wonders cost a lot of time and resources. I expect significant benefit for the expenditure.

 

[Duble Iskender]

Not for me, it's not! Ok, it has it's problems, i get angry, i get frustrated, i complain a lot! But i'm still here and so are you! That means the game is not as bad as you make it sound.
Why don't you wait and see how these new features will be and then we can all complain together, knowing what we are crying about?
As i see it, lately the devs started to partly listen to the community. See demolition, bazooka tower, stalemate issue, dock, NTG's, tactical helicopter, matchmaking, they are trying to adress sandbagging, and probably more, but that's what came to my mind wiyhout thinking too long. P2W will always be there, cause they need to pay bills. If this new building will be an issue, it will be sorted out.

lol you arent a smart one but i am smart... all problems are intened like sand bag. just remove 2 attack on two diffirent target to two attack on one target thats over we said countless time. ofc you never hear... plus i dont belive your honesty. very high chance you are bhg worker. now shut up...

 

[Master Contrail Program]

I'm not a fan of the game's overall direction either. Nor the devs' inabilty or outright refusal to address critical issues. However showing up every three months to spout off like a Mediterranean Yosemite Sam, about a game you supposedly were quitting a year ago does what, exactly?

Certainly puts the ''smart person'' thing in doubt at any rate.

 

[Imaera]

Of course you are smart! You already proved it, insulting those that doesn't agree with you! )
Senin gibi zeki olmadığım için gururluyum!

 

[Norcaltone]

I can adapt to any change in the game, but must say this battle time tiebreaker was a bad idea then and it's still bad now. Please just allow perfect score stalemates with full loot for both sides. Time just shows who invested more cards for both battles. It has also been proven to be a hackable element in World War.

 

[Manifesto]

Master Contrail Program
Imaera
I was going to make a comment along the lines of what you said, but you've covered it very well!

 

[cclaerbo]

I'm quite good at this game but I'm not talking for smaller percentage of people that can adapt their playing styles to just about any changes that are made. It's just how any game works. You make defense too strong the majority of people are going to fail on attacks which isn't very fun. You can always direct comments right to me about getting gud. Of course you mean get good your welcome to bring your base over for a friendly challenge anytime. I'll take it out

 

[T4TiFooS]

Should we expect adding live show of ww attacks after adding adding replays permanently?

 

[MartinK12]

I must said I'm pleased with all the recent actions you took. Much appreciate them ALL. With the easier access to Troop Tactics I actually start using them during my attacks and even bought them few times.

It's nice to see TinSoldier in action. That's the customer care I was talking about in my previous posts And that's the kind of gameplay and cooperation (devs-players) I'd like to see for the next 8 and even more years - because we can all agree that this game still have huge potential and can provide years of fun for us - players, and money for You - developers.
And finally that's the kind of game I actually want to support with my money

Thank You and cheers

 

[Navalis]

I can't say I am a fan of 'Damaged Generals' spawning from the Fort. To me that just means you won't have fresh (your best?) Generals on board for your next attack without paying Crowns. Yes you invest in your Generals but they aren't 'one and done' like troop tactics. At least if you Fort is sabotaged and destroyed they are back and ready to go for the next attack and/or defense.

 

[Imaera]

I don't think i will use more than one general (the weakest one) for defense, on the regular base. For war attacks, generals are not affected if they are killed in battle while defending the base. At least for now...

 

[Empire]

I think we have to now resort to not using generals for our town base defense. Sad really.

 

[Navalis]

On a side note, what does this mean for the Pentagon?