August State of the Nations

Imaera

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
455
dominations is just a .. boring grindfull p2w stupit buggy game now adays..
Not for me, it's not! Ok, it has it's problems, i get angry, i get frustrated, i complain a lot! But i'm still here and so are you! That means the game is not as bad as you make it sound.
Why don't you wait and see how these new features will be and then we can all complain together, knowing what we are crying about?
As i see it, lately the devs started to partly listen to the community. See demolition, bazooka tower, stalemate issue, dock, NTG's, tactical helicopter, matchmaking, they are trying to adress sandbagging, and probably more, but that's what came to my mind wiyhout thinking too long. P2W will always be there, cause they need to pay bills. If this new building will be an issue, it will be sorted out.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
Htmk5 , when people come on here saying things like ''brits are OP, they killed my castle without activating my generals'' or ''brits are OP and stole all my rss'' it's called complaining.
If they gave a valid set of statistics that can PROVE the brits are OP, THAT's facts.
 

Tsamu

Approved user
LV
4
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
715
Awards
1
The recent changes to daily dock bonus to include national trade goods (NTGs), and the increased chance of earning them in battle, has made the United Nations wonder power of 3 random NTGs per day pointless. And with the next update we get an extra NTG if we earn one in battle. I think it only fair that you adjust the wonder power to give us 3 of our least plentiful resources, rather than random. Or change the power to rebalancing our NTGs, replacing those that are maxed with some that are in short supply.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
Why look at the wonder as being pointless, why not look at it as being a bonus?
 

Thevinegru

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
15
It's going to target the largest grouping of attacking troops so it's splash damage.
 

Thevinegru

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
15
Sounds like the missile silo will like to attack tanks primarily since they have the highest highpoints. I guess the British archer spammers will have to start using these again which is great in my opinion.

It said it's targeting the largest grouping of troops. I would guess that means the guys behind the tanks but my guess is as good as yours.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
Sounds like the missile silo will like to attack tanks primarily since they have the highest highpoints. I guess the British archer spammers will have to start using these again which is great in my opinion.
It said it's targeting the largest grouping of troops. I would guess that means the guys behind the tanks but my guess is as good as yours.
It actually says the ''biggest cluster of hitpoints'' but hopefully it will be a fairly large amount of hitpoints, which as ReekyBullet said might encourage Brit spammers to use tanks.
 

Tsamu

Approved user
LV
4
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
715
Awards
1
Wonders cost a lot of time and resources. I expect significant benefit for the expenditure.
 

Duble Iskender

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
38
Not for me, it's not! Ok, it has it's problems, i get angry, i get frustrated, i complain a lot! But i'm still here and so are you! That means the game is not as bad as you make it sound.
Why don't you wait and see how these new features will be and then we can all complain together, knowing what we are crying about?
As i see it, lately the devs started to partly listen to the community. See demolition, bazooka tower, stalemate issue, dock, NTG's, tactical helicopter, matchmaking, they are trying to adress sandbagging, and probably more, but that's what came to my mind wiyhout thinking too long. P2W will always be there, cause they need to pay bills. If this new building will be an issue, it will be sorted out.

lol you arent a smart one but i am smart... all problems are intened like sand bag. just remove 2 attack on two diffirent target to two attack on one target thats over we said countless time. ofc you never hear... plus i dont belive your honesty. very high chance you are bhg worker. now shut up...
 

Master Contrail Program

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2016
Messages
350
I'm not a fan of the game's overall direction either. Nor the devs' inabilty or outright refusal to address critical issues. However showing up every three months to spout off like a Mediterranean Yosemite Sam, about a game you supposedly were quitting a year ago does what, exactly?

Certainly puts the ''smart person'' thing in doubt at any rate.
 

Imaera

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
455
Of course you are smart! You already proved it, insulting those that doesn't agree with you! :))
Senin gibi zeki olmadığım için gururluyum!
 

Norcaltone

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
72
I can adapt to any change in the game, but must say this battle time tiebreaker was a bad idea then and it's still bad now. Please just allow perfect score stalemates with full loot for both sides. Time just shows who invested more cards for both battles. It has also been proven to be a hackable element in World War.
 

cclaerbo

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Oct 17, 2016
Messages
122
I'm quite good at this game but I'm not talking for smaller percentage of people that can adapt their playing styles to just about any changes that are made. It's just how any game works. You make defense too strong the majority of people are going to fail on attacks which isn't very fun. You can always direct comments right to me about getting gud. Of course you mean get good your welcome to bring your base over for a friendly challenge anytime. I'll take it out
 

T4TiFooS

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2017
Messages
222
Should we expect adding live show of ww attacks after adding adding replays permanently?
 

MartinK12

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 19, 2016
Messages
378
I must said I'm pleased with all the recent actions you took. Much appreciate them ALL. With the easier access to Troop Tactics I actually start using them during my attacks and even bought them few times.

It's nice to see TinSoldier in action. That's the customer care I was talking about in my previous posts :) And that's the kind of gameplay and cooperation (devs-players) I'd like to see for the next 8 and even more years - because we can all agree that this game still have huge potential and can provide years of fun for us - players, and money for You - developers.
And finally that's the kind of game I actually want to support with my money ;)

Thank You and cheers :)
 

Navalis

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
493
I can't say I am a fan of 'Damaged Generals' spawning from the Fort. To me that just means you won't have fresh (your best?) Generals on board for your next attack without paying Crowns. Yes you invest in your Generals but they aren't 'one and done' like troop tactics. At least if you Fort is sabotaged and destroyed they are back and ready to go for the next attack and/or defense.
 

Imaera

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
455
I don't think i will use more than one general (the weakest one) for defense, on the regular base. For war attacks, generals are not affected if they are killed in battle while defending the base. At least for now...
 

Empire

Approved user
LV
0
 
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,000
I think we have to now resort to not using generals for our town base defense. Sad really.
 
Top