Aussiemedic
New member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2018
- Messages
- 1
G’Day I have been trying to join an Alliance with Australians but the game keeps telling me that I can’t because they are in a different realm????
Australians where are you??
- Thread starter Aussiemedic
- Start date
King Barbs
Approved user
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 55
Hi Aussiemedic, we are an Australian alliance & always looking for new Aussie members, Aus Elite 1 is the name, come and join in the fun as we rampage across the planet.
Hi Wrathchild,
The way we do it is based on net stars earned in the war. Each war the stars you earn in each battle are added, and stars against you are taken away to give you a net star amount for that war. Each competition is played over a minimum of three wars (rounds), and continues if needed to additional wars until there is one clear winner.
If you miss an attack, you score -1 for that attack. So it encourages people to participate in the wars.
We have an alliance rule that you cannot attack a base less than half your level in the first half of the war. If anyone is found doing this, they are immediately disqualified from the current competition.
The way we do it is based on net stars earned in the war. Each war the stars you earn in each battle are added, and stars against you are taken away to give you a net star amount for that war. Each competition is played over a minimum of three wars (rounds), and continues if needed to additional wars until there is one clear winner.
If you miss an attack, you score -1 for that attack. So it encourages people to participate in the wars.
We have an alliance rule that you cannot attack a base less than half your level in the first half of the war. If anyone is found doing this, they are immediately disqualified from the current competition.
@Attilla : Shouldnt the level of the attacker and the attacked play a role in the scroring process? e.g: Atomic age guy getting a 10* on 2 GA bases Vs 2 AA bases.
Also what about the number of attacks absorbed (failed attempts by the opponent )?
Reason for asking; I was trying to conjure a man of the match concept for a war but could not come to a clear set of well defined guidelines and it was only qualitative.
Also what about the number of attacks absorbed (failed attempts by the opponent )?
Reason for asking; I was trying to conjure a man of the match concept for a war but could not come to a clear set of well defined guidelines and it was only qualitative.
Hey Ask97,
Yeah we've only just started doing it, and I have thought about the types of things you've mentioned. There is some work involved in collating it all into a spreadsheet etc which takes time, and in updating the team how the leaderboard is progressing during the wars. To be honest keeping track of all the failed attacks and what level attacked what level etc would simply make it too complicated for me to compile.
I think what you've said would be better, it's just the logistics of it. We work somewhat on the honor system. We have an expectation that what is best for the team is what people will do, i.e. not just smashing bases way under their ability. If people are caught doing that they are disqualified and quite frankly would be booted from the alliance.
Running it on net stars at the end of the war is is admittedly somewhat of a blunt instrument, but doing the competition over three wars rewards consistency and is fun enough to provide a bit of excitement and something to fight for even if we have no chance of winning the war.
Yeah we've only just started doing it, and I have thought about the types of things you've mentioned. There is some work involved in collating it all into a spreadsheet etc which takes time, and in updating the team how the leaderboard is progressing during the wars. To be honest keeping track of all the failed attacks and what level attacked what level etc would simply make it too complicated for me to compile.
I think what you've said would be better, it's just the logistics of it. We work somewhat on the honor system. We have an expectation that what is best for the team is what people will do, i.e. not just smashing bases way under their ability. If people are caught doing that they are disqualified and quite frankly would be booted from the alliance.
Running it on net stars at the end of the war is is admittedly somewhat of a blunt instrument, but doing the competition over three wars rewards consistency and is fun enough to provide a bit of excitement and something to fight for even if we have no chance of winning the war.
