Bad WW matchmaking, how to forfeit?

[Mat 3 BloodyBarons]

last 3 WW we had bad matchmaking on both ways, current one again.
unfortunately there is no way to contact our opponent, so I send a message to my team, no donation, no coalition.
What do u think as a message to the opponent that we are forfeiting, #1 is attacking the easiest one?
your opinion is welcome
thanks
Mat from 3BloodyBarons est 07/2015

 

[moriador]

When we are up against a losing battle we still donate (because the troops cost virtually nothing) and some people still use coalitions because they want to ensure at least 1 star against an equivalent-age enemy to maximise the rubies. But I can understand if you're not really active you may not want to use coalitions. Not sure how you're going to message the opponent... is there a way to do that?

 

[Manifesto]

Drop one shooter only?
Maybe rally him around the base for fun.

 

[pckrn]

not making any attacks at all would make the message clear. or everyone make attacks but quit immediately for 0 second 0 star results. if you get any stars, or if your 0 star battles are lasting 1-2 minutes, they would have to watch the replays to get any message and they might not do that.

 

[Manifesto]

I like the idea of them wasting their time watching a 2 minute replay of a lone trooper running around their base.

 

[Alexey]

The easiest way is to rename your alliance. But I don’t think there’s much sense in sending a message. When we get an unbeatable match, I usually encourage everybody to hit the easiest base with the most valuable ntgs.

 

[Thud_]

When bad match ups happen, all you can do is work to collect Alliance XP.

 

[Shrekx 74]

Ntgs, alliance perk points are the things of value you can still maximize. The original question is really not an issue, if you see totally unbalanced matchup, the other side will also.

 

[sileepuppee]

You shouldn't ever really "forfeit" a war because there's still reasons to fight that others above listed but you can tell generally right away whether it's a win or lose. We also try to be courteous as well and let the opponent know that we aren't bothering to waste troop cards and such when we can. Since the whole cwa war weight issue (If you would call it an issue depending on whether you're on the receiving end of the nonsense) our matchups have been heavily one sided. we are at 24k glory currently and the last 2 wars have been us either against 900+ glory or lose 100. We haven't had these kind of numbers since we were under 20k glory. On the other side there were 6-10 cwa bases over lvl 250+ yet the highest lvl were always much lower on the list because of the war weight mismatch vs our 2 cwa bases. I know this is a normal thing for many alliances but since we haven't seen numbers like this is over a year, something definitely changed.

 

[No Angel]

Since there is no option for it, while getting War Chests is more worth it than expressing our way of concern to the other team, we might want to score at least 1 or 2 stars on the hardest bases, then proceed to reach 60% stars.

 

[Berend_War]

We also always attack but with impossible matches. We give everybody a free attack of choice and our top attackers hold for 12 hours to see what there top does. During the free attacks I advise to save your SH troops and coalitions is free of choice.
Most of the time 60% of all stars is the goal. We do expect 2 attacks from all in war.

 

[oddin]

same here but this does not solve the problem and eventually is destructive for our morale.

 

[Berend_War]

I know wrathchild_78 after 4 impossible wars it's hard to get everybody back in doing there 2 attacks at full strength. That's why we want everybody to do 2 attacks. That way there attleast involved in war.
Let's hope the new system is any good. Muet announced that they will start implementing it next month.