CWA vs GA. Why why why

[Coozman]

So pissed with CWA attacking GA. Come on. Attack your own age you pansies

 

[shukra]

i'm cwa and 'next' when i see a ga; i agree.

 

[phil_dee]

We need NTGs though, it makes sense that we would take the least resistant path to get them.

 

[Mountainking]

So pissed with CWA attacking GA. Come on. Attack your own age you pansies

hahaha We've all been there dude

 

[LordStark263AC]

There is a penalty for CWA hitting Global bases, I don't remember exact figures, maybe 40% less or so...

 

[unhappy]

I think this is an unanticipated outcome of the 'rebalancing'.

Now much much easier to take a GA instead of AA/CWA. Suck it up and blame Nexon.

 

[LordStark263AC]

Wrong answer. Get your facts right first.

 

[oddin]

not all cwa are super strong you know mate. I am currently 231 and if someone has decent loot and je is around mid atomic I will give it a try. But when I want to gather diamonds and ntgs then I will 100% press next until I find easy global age bases. It is the nature of things. When I was global same thing happened to me. When I was a new industrial, global age players raped me daily. Just get used to it.

 

[Persia]

People were upset when CWA came out and it was revealed that they could attack Global bases. It must be even worse now that AA and CWA bases are generally more difficult to defeat, barring the occasional poorly constructed base.

 

[Mountainking]

To be honest, I would not even attempt to remotely touch my base with a 10 foot pole while farming ....

 

[shukra]

same; i can sometimes wipe out level 220 cwa bases but for the most part they are no longer targets.

 

[skychan]

More properly,

They can no longer 5* CWA bases, and will lose 1/2 their army on AA bases, so if they want NTG's they have to hit GA bases.

 

[Manifesto]

Attack your own age you pansies

Pansy?
Now I'm definitely coming for you!

 

[Saruman the White]

They should remove that ridiculous requirement of 220 XP level for CWA, opening it to everyone who wish to take their chances, as well as widening the CWA attack pool. That way they wouldn't have to allow CWA to attack GA.

 

[Coozman]

Ok. Pansy might be the wrong term here
However I get the easy NTG (if you get 3+ stars) but it really doesn’t seem to be in a balanced state.
I’m averaged for 3K in medals (ranking) and when’s scouting to attack CWA 2% AA 95% GA 2.9% and IA 0.1%
Only thing that really gets me is the medal loss agsinst CWA. Resources I can get, that’s part of game get it, spend it or loss it. But my average loss to CWA being around 2-3* and they take approximately 10-18 medals really frustrates me

That is what I should really have stated with this thread

69% of AA that attack me lose and 1/3 CWA do as well.

So summarizing. It’s the medal count loss that seems rather disappointing. If I lost more loot and less medals to CWA I’d accept that more easily

Just seems that the term rebalance sort of goes out the window when CWA (lvl 300) attacks a GA (lvl 205)