Egyptian Nation

[RushSkies]

I would like to suggest the Egyptian Nation one of the greatest civilization of all time.
The Egyptian Nation architecture will be adjacent to the Arab and Muslim buildings.
Thus Egyptian Nation will have a unique design from European ( English, French , German) Iberian (Greek, Roman) and Asian (Chinese, Japanese)

The Egyptians

Nation Power: - 10% more chance acquiring luxury resource [cider] (from fruit trees and raiding other players) or the only nation to acquire luxury resource (cider) on farms 10% chance.
Unique Unit: - Chariots [unit size:2] instead of three: (By any chance this will be the first unique unit of Calvary Raiders)
- Deals quadruple damage against resource buildings or twice movement speed of typical raider

Historical Basis

Nation Power: Egyptians are credited as being one of the first groups of people to practice agriculture on a large scale. This was possible because of the ingenuity of the Egyptians as they developed basin irrigation.Their farming practices allowed them to grow staple food crops, especially grains such as wheat and barley, and industrial crops, such as flax and papyrus - Wikipedia

Unique Unit: "Battle of Kadesh"

Pros:

• Good for players who prioritize loot raiding over medals
• Cider power (mercenary, blessing)

Cons:

• No defense bonuses
• Prioritizing resource raids than medals means less effectiveness in competitive ladder
• Unique unit is useless in defense and medal hunts

Why I like to suggest this Nation?

1. Campaign of Egyptians does not look like Egyptian architecture at all
2. ​New Arab architecture will bring forth other Arab nations such as (Persia, Carthage, Sassanids, Ottoman, Turkey, India?)
3. General Cleopatra
4. Wonder Pyramids
5. Adding this nation will boost more popularity to this game thus make it more enjoyable
6. More diversity, More fun

Thank you
RushSkies

 

[DanQ]

I like that you have considered not just what nation you would like to see added to the game, and why historically speaking, but also how it could be implemented practically based on existing mechanics. You have worked to structure it differently so as to give it an identity distinguishable from the others. My only dislike is the inclusion of "cons": focus on that which differentiates one nation from another in terms of boosts and variations, not withdrawals and handicaps.

While I still believe that now is not the time to be adding new nations (re: where the game is seemingly at in its development), your specific suggestion and more importantly how you have approached this is worth future consideration.

 

[RushSkies]

Actually the cons I included are structurally formed like the cons Nexon made to other nations. All nations had no withdrawals and handicaps. Cons actually represent the trade-off you made by choosing a nation from the other like you well never be as well-rounded as Chinese or have as many solider as Romans and etc.

Yeah the implementation of this take place if they do agree to this suggestion would be 6 months to 1 year considering the substantial amounts of bug need to fix.

 

[DanQ]

Actually the cons I included are structurally formed like the cons Nexon made to other nations. All nations had no withdrawals and handicaps. Cons actually represent the trade-off you made by choosing a nation from the other like you well never be as well-rounded as Chinese or have as many solider as Romans and etc.

To me a con is choosing one nation over another because you decided to go with its pros... and over all other nations too, of course.

 

[Christophe]

Great suggestion ...however Egyptians are not related to arab s at all Egypt is in Africa hello they are Africans black Ppl not Arabs even though Arabs are technically related to blacks anyway its further than u think...

 

[David Pasquinel]

I think that Egypt should follow their unique ancient kingdom architeture until the Medieval Age, when they became islamic. Persia and other middle eastern should go through their "mesopotamian-like" architeture until they get the same as Egypt.

Also, I think that the powers of Egypt should be centered around food production, as the Nile river made possible a great nation prosper in the middle of the desert, as far as being called "The barn of Rome" when it became a roman province, in the days of the Republic.