how should the Assault Rally be?

[Alexey]

AR should be separated in two different tactics: assault rally and defense rally. Dps boost of assault rally should be fixed somewhere around 120-150, and the upgrades should only add to the duration time.

 

[Kanechoigo]

Just change each tactic maximum carrying capacity as 2

 

[Manifesto]

ixnay on the aximummay arryingcay apacitycay.
Haven't you heard, people dont want the tactics limited.

 

[Kanechoigo]

Come on mate, 2 sabotages 2 decoys 2ar +1 any other tactic combination has more fun than using AR 7 times in a battle

 

[Manifesto]

No need to convince me, just have a look at some of my other posts.

 

[oddin]

i am one of the few that voted : 120% dps output, 50% or less protect

Since we want the game balanced, that is imho the right combination OR higher dps output and NO protect

 

[~Kratos~]

Even 2 AR in its current state would be overpowered. Enough to wipe out any base's most defended section.

 

[Houkai]

How about AR losing protect, while increasing the range and effect of the real Protect. That way it will be a nice combo. AR's DPS can be lowered but not by much.

 

[jagadeeshgarapati]

you want your defense back on the picture

 

[jagadeeshgarapati]

i voted 260% with 50% protect. this will make AR still powerfull but not useless. i want buffing on other tactics also which should have happened before.
Protect: increase time
Sabotage: it is well balanced.
Decoys: increase time and Health
First aid: balanced
demolition: ideally it should take down a building
Betrayal: balanced but can be improved a bit to make it more usable.
barrage: this should get more changes. it should at least do more damage to troops and suppress them.

Buffing all tactics will make offense again on high but at same time defense also should be buffed.

Reballance was some how left in between. that should be done with good analysis.
With AR so much buffed people forget that howies and infantry(Also APC) are use less once AR is nerfed. before AR came infantry was taking lot of time to take down a farm. who are actually specialized troops to take down buildings.

 

[oddin]

hahaha my defence in reality is non existant....I am a cwa player with global age defences...

 

[Xabar]

TinSoldier BHG_Muet . Improving defenses are totally desestimulated. The tactic Stats overloaded. The damage reduction have to be lower than a Protect, and the other stats can not be higher than the Gladiatior Force Tactic.

-The actual AR (90%), protect more than a Protect Tactic (50%). The protect efect of AR have to be lower than 25% or 0%. To make the Protect useful again (Damage reduction)
-The duration is exagerated too.
-The speed boost at 170% is too much. 100% at level 4 tactic.
-Attack Speed Increase have to be lowered
-Damage Increase have to be 100% at level 4 tactic.
****But, you can convine the AR with a Protect

Ex. Level 1:
-Damage reduction: 5% (+5%/level)
-Duration: 9 seg (+1seg/level)
-Speed boost: 70% (+10%/level)
-Attack Speed: 30% (-5%/level)
​​​​​​​-Damage Increase: 70% (+10%/level)

Ex. Level 4:
-Damage reduction: 20%
-Duration: 12 seg
-Speed boost: 100%
-Attack Speed: 15%
-Damage Increase: 100%

 

[NateTheGreat]

There shouldn't need to be a cap, people should be able to chose what 7 tactics to carry in their kit. The main problem is having one tactic OP unbalances the entire system. If each tactic is properly balanced then players will adopt a multi faceted tool kit. Ex. The barrage tactic is lame. If the barrage tactic area of effect was increased to 15 radius and could wipe out all defending enemy infantry people would use it again.

 

[No Angel]

Stop spamming Xabar, can't you post appropriately?
Good input, just don't spam

 

[~Kratos~]

It's too many topics created about AR, he probably just really wants the devs to see his post in case they only read one thread or something. I think it's fine

 

[Manifesto]

People do this for 2 reasons:
1. They feel they're not being noticed and want attention.
2. They feel their way is the only way because their entire reasoning is based on a single outcome, wars.
They don't see anyone else's point of view.

 

[~Kratos~]

There -is- no other reason to upgrade/advance in this game other than wars, objectively... unless you look at this game as a farmville type of town builder. The solo MP portion of the game is quite meaningless with all the abandoned bases and with no meaningful reason to climb high in medals, with all the hackers there. Most of the people I know in this game look at the MP purely as a grind for resources.

Thus the only competitive aspect of the game is world wars, which is currently a mockery with this tactic.

 

[No Angel]

Yeah right, too many topics created to protest AR, all posted by the same people?!
World Wars make the game competitive at certain point. But they who war don't equal they who don't. Make a survey, you'll count that non-warring players exist more than warring ones. They don't speak up, cause they like the AR state, makes sense Kratos?

 

[Manifesto]

{[Fresh]}Kratos
Thank you for perfectly demonstrating point #2.
Silly me, thinking you had no objectivity.

 

[Manifesto]

Things have been quiet on the complaints front, l wonder if the AR has been tweaked to everyone's satisfaction or if people are now using it themselves.
Or, like most things, people have moved on to the next 'cause'.