Huge Issue With Glory System!

[Drunken Master]

I am more of a lurker and do not post much here. But I have been around for over a year. I was here before glory determined who the top alliance was. I have a question for Nexon: How is it that glory determines who is a top alliance? I am the leader of Bad Rabbits alliance. I look at the leaderboards and see a large number of teams in the top 100 that would not stand a chance against us in war. We are currently in a war against another alliance that has 14 atomic age players level 200 and is also not on the leaderboards. The reason we are not hitting the leaderboard is because we are constantly trading off glory back and fourth with other very strong alliances. Meanwhile, while I have 3 players over level 200, and a ton of high level global and industrial (close to level 200), I will never get a match with any of the alliances ranked 90 to 100 in the world. I won't get that match because of your matchmaking algorithms that say my alliance is too strong to face that top 100 alliance. How does this make any sense!? Now you know why teams sandbag left and right! It is better to not be good and keep balance with weaker players... This isn't a bug that needs to be fixed. It is just a massive mistake you have made. The only way we win wars is by going perfect against other alliances that sometimes are global down to their 20th rank! If you are a top 100 alliance and not catching these types of match ups, you should not be a top 100 alliance! Hope Nexon figures this out! The strongest alliances should be rewarded instead of punished for being too good! Glory should be based on strength of alliance, not how much you have from beating up on weaker alliances. We currently have about the same glory as our feeder alliance (bad rabbits 2) that rarely ever lose a war. They have 2 global players and the rest industrial and down... Figure it out Nexon... Your system is broken!