Iron Base Stacking - Aussie Shred Experience

[Vixen]

Nb4powerup - attempt two without so much emotion okay?


We have chosen to not actively participate in our current war against our current opponent for two reasons

• stacking their bases with iron age and classic age to get them a lower war match
• cheating issue discussed in other thread and the worst offender has since left alliance so we assume Nexon dealt with that

Alliances who do this have made the leaderboard a joke and irrelevant and are making the game no fun for non global alliances. You are killing the game.

Our current war
their medals 24,781 our medals 13,523
we know war isn't based on medals but it demonstrates the difference

Them
20 very high global #1 lvl 198... #20 lvl 171
2 industrial
1 gunpowder
3 classical
four iron age

Us
4 global #175 down
16 industrial
7 enlightenment
2 gunpowder
one medieval - very much part of our team

Thank you guys for supporting my earlier post. We need to keep this issue forefront under Nexon's nose folks so please keep commenting.

Sorry I naturally wrote Melbourne Shred in title - we have changed to Aussie Shred.. (Melbourne girl at heart)

 

[Nb4powerup]

I changed the title for you

 

[Vixen]

Thank you!

 

[fussy]

Waving my support flag for this post

 

[Prodigal Clint]

Hey wow, you were on that in like 17 minutes..... did u happen to miss this post: https://forum.nexonm.com/forum/nexo...us-understand-your-stance-on-war-issues/page3

 

[Brand Marrow]

I was surprised this war was so lopsided when the opposing alliance did not really stack their bases as badly as some of the more egregious stackers. Maybe Nexon is factoring glory into war match ups? This would kind of make sense in that the top glory alliances would eventually have to duke it out. But its probably just a bad match up algorithm....

O, hi fussy. Long time no see

 

[fussy]

Ohhh yes erm hello Brand Marrow

 

[Brand Marrow]

so, umm, UK greens having lopsided wars too?

 

[fussy]

We must stop meeting like this .
No we haven't as yet but i sure would be raging like Vixen if we had.

 

[Vixen]

fussy I've over the rage.... just want the issue fixed...
I think Vix needs a greens visit soon... get that bar ready!

 

[fussy]

Vixen the bar is fully stocked

 

[Brand Marrow]

Margaritas?

 

[fussy]

Tequila...i think ive seen some somewhere?

 

[Brand Marrow]

Yup, we unpacked about a dozen boxes of it last week

 

[Vixen]

I will bring the limes and salt!

 

[kennynguyen]

Think this problem can be fixed easily. Limit the different ages btw the top and the bottom to 2-3 ages. For ex. The top global should bring min EA ally to war, not below.

 

[Glacier]

Volume Zero is currently in a rematch with USA Dankness.

Vz: Dankness:
5 global 12 global
9 industrial 12 industrial
14 enlightenment 2 enlightenment
7 gunpowder 0 gunpowder
4 medieval 0 medieval
1 classic 7 classic
7 iron


1st war match produced: VZ 182 vs Dankness 186

I felt we did real well being so out numbered up top. Running a tight race as we speak in the rematch, will post results tomorrow ;-]

We feel a well planned method of attack will defeat these types of alliances.

 

[Brand Marrow]

lol, I'm currently having a bit of a battle royale with a dankness player about this over in the thread you started Glacier

 

[Glacier]

So these "stacked Alliances" are running 40/45s, so drop outa that size war and let them stay in search mode, lol. That way nexon can't "close" your threads ;-]

 

[Brand Marrow]

He's claiming that the 7 classic and 7 iron age bases are from ''real'' players, who just happen to be inactive.... it is looks rotten and smells rotten....guess what? Its rotten.