Most handicapped nation poll and explain why!

Most handicapped nation poll and explain why!

  • France

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Britain

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Germany

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • Rome

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Greece

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Japan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • China

    Votes: 3 33.3%

  • Total voters
    9

MadFury

Approved user
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
297
I say France. When comparing troop queues with other players in our alliance it's showing no difference! It took an equal amount of time for a French a Greek and a Roman to build 10 soldiers of the same level in the same age! That difference has to be increased or more pronounced to make a difference.
 

Skillz

Approved user
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
139
Great idea for a poll cant wait for the results to mature :D

Really doc you think this is a good idea?

I think it is a very bad idea. Either i have misunderstood or it is being very badly stated. The fact is the nations have their unique pros and cons and no nation is more handicapped then other. I think the best nation depends on the player himself. For example,

French are supposedly able to train troops faster than other nations so this nation is the best for players who are constantly looking to battle.


Mad fury if you can please try to take some picture and post them here showing what level troops you have and build them in a barracks. I will also check mine as i am a Roman and i think it would be greatly beneficial to have pictures of the same thing from every nation.
 

NatalieRath

Approved user
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
6
The british has longbowmen. THAT alone is a great benefit. Being able to shoot towers far away enough to not get shot is AMAZING. I keep losing to british players who brings swarms of longbowmen.
 

MadFury

Approved user
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
297
I see what your saying Skillz but I think the poll is valid. After all we've been having these discussions in our alliance for days. As for the pros and cons it's true every nation has them. But as we've discussed it makes perfect sense to have a good idea what nations feel most severely impacted by thier cons. For example in our alliance some members with Greece have come to realize that thier nation bonus has no endgame value! If they reach a final level and have no further upgrades what good is the use of being able to speed up upgrades? I just hope people explain whag the reason is for casting the vote.
 

Erased

Approved user
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
1
I say China. Although the endgame point with Greece is perfectly valid, endgame seems to be pretty far off atm, unless you choose to use crowns to reach it. However with China, you don't really get any benefit at all in practice. The extra citizen is practically useless as the final number of them never quite fits for anything but hunting rabbits or an occasional forest clearing. The extra defending troops are the same thing. At the current point of the game, there are exactly zero players that don't spam archers so even if the bonus was much greater, this wouldn't have any real impact on the game. Finally, unique archers are a joke. By themselves, they aren't that bad, but compared to other nations' special units, they are desperately weak and, once again, don't offer any real advantage in the battle because of that.
 
Top