We just finished a war with Korea Army B stacked us too 2 iron, 1 classical on a 20v20.so it's not just happening on the big wars. I know how discouraging it can be for you and your team. We got through it and this current matchup with Espana Elite is more our level with no stacking. War the way it was meant to be.
After a month of the community asking in this thread and dozens of others for at least some sort of communication....Im guessing the answer to the question in the title is a clear "No." lol.
I dont really expect companies to reply in threads like this, I think that is ok. But, I can say that if my company had an issue like this impacting its customers, quality of product, etc...there would be a giant sticky post at least recognizing problems and updates/actions against them, or at least information on why things are the way they are and wont be changing.
Just another general update on the Prodigal Thieves war experience. Had a non stacked/sandbagging team last war, was a great matchup and a really hard team. Poured in tons of effort planning and strategizing. Ended in a stalemate no reward.
Current war right back into stacking/sandbagging/exploitation. Have seen worse but this team has high globals on top and the bottom 15% all undeveloped bases that will most likely not be logged on even for the war.
Nexon help your customers, please. It's ruined war until it's fixed.
The current system is self-correcting. Ultimately every alliance will consist of 25 Global Age and 25 Iron Age. Whatever size war it will be 50% Global, 50% Iron Age, it can't be anything else if you want a chance at not losing but they will all end in stalemate.
The only glimmer of hope is that any future war game developers are taking note on how not to design a war game.
Since other threads with these questions have gotten derailed and closed, trying to keep this one current. For what its worth, all but one of our last 10 wars has either been against a team sandbagging/stacking iron age bases, or a stalemate.