Please nuke the fighters damage against buildings.

FroggyKilla

Approved user
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
550
Why would bombers need the suppression effect if they’ve already trashed the defenses outright?
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
Fighters are OP. They shouldn’t be better in almost every way over bombers.
They cost less, have more hp, use up one slot, deal more damage to buildings then they should, faster speed, slow down buildings and have an area attack on troops.

Remove the slow from the fighters and give it to the bombers and reduce the damage the fighters deal to buildings.
To be fair Gavin, are you talking about fighters in general or maxed fighters?
If you're talking about fighters in general I say they're not OP especially in IA or early Global as air defenses take them out easily if you don't use them well.
Once they're upgraded several times they become powerful and rightly so. It takes a lot of time and resources, as many have pointed out, and we want to see rewards for our efforts.
Also, as people become more experienced they use better strategies with their planes. This is another reason they might seem OP, people are using them well and bringing them home, so they might seem invincible. Trust me they're not.
Many a time I've had to massage my planes or not use them at the end of a battle because they were so badly damaged. :D
 
Last edited:

kal-el

Approved user
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
18
Gavin dont be so salty...put in the work and max out your own fighters. In the mean time, please shut up and leave.
 

TinSoldier

New member
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
1,568
I couldn't imagine any rebalance that would have these two units stray too far from their current relationship to one another. A lot of smart folks have pointed out the pros and cons of each role these planes cover, as well as their historical context.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
I couldn't imagine any rebalance that would have these two units stray too far from their current relationship to one another. A lot of smart folks have pointed out the pros and cons of each role these planes cover, as well as their historical context.
Yes, but bombers still need chaff!
Also, while we're on the subject, any reason why my bomber post in the Ideas section was redirected to the Forum Rules section?
 

SiuYin

Approved user
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Messages
540
Yes Fighter is a bit OP, but if talking about nerf fighter, we need to buff the attacking force first.
Given that (Maxed) defense is too powerful compare with (Maxed) offense

We need buff on Bomber and increase troop size in order to compensate fighter's nerf
 

pckrn

Approved user
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
666
Yes, but bombers still need chaff!
Also, while we're on the subject, any reason why my bomber post in the Ideas section was redirected to the Forum Rules section?

and that redirect topic cant even be replied to.
i wanted to add:

chaff is a good idea because sometimes i will send in a fighter ahead of a bomber to take the hit thinking im so smart, and then the fighter makes a left turn while the bomber makes a right turn and there is a SAM to the right.
there is nothing a player can do about this because we cant control which way they turn
 

Mountainking

Approved user
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
767
Fighters are definetely not OP. Upgrade your defenses.....A couple of max sams/air defs and nobody is going to mess with you by launching them.
 

Radzeer

Approved user
Joined
May 2, 2015
Messages
510
Fighters are not OP themselves, they are OP compared to any other flying object in the game except the ICBS (but that cant be used in attacking). This game is designed for the attacker (you can't open the game and start defending, don't you), so whatever is the designer taking away from the attacker will make the game less attractive.
Gavin, I believe you missed completely the point in this game, and have no idea how you should use it to feel the thrill ;)
 

Seraph

Approved user
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
27
My fighters are 3 away from max and against a base with some strong towers, fort, air defenses and sam batteries... They go down pretty fast. I also have Amelia capped out.

While they are strong, they take a lot of work to get up there. I think far too many people under value towers. At max level (cwa) they do over 700 damage per second when connected to a road (radar). Also towers will prioritize airplanes over tanks (or so it seems) so they come in and get tagged by towers or air defenses (that can have over 1k damage when fully maxed out) and people will fear hitting you with planes.
 
Top