The game is out of balance worse than ever.

[Chadwicke]

War attacks and multiplayer are both way to difficult spending 18 Dollars just for Coalitions because most nations don't really exist anymore. Plus cards for war is around 50$ then most war attacks on defense bases of equal age go for 0-2 stars (RPG attack ) this is not fun to play this way at all. Training blessings broken cost 50 cents per retrain , and ntgs are mostly unavailable BHG_Muet . Most players don't want to play this way we have already lost 8 player since digital age update ,why are you doing this ?

 

[Visionman]

Learn how to play and attack better.

 

[King Crimson]

Forget about wars. It's too much stress.

 

[Theoneandonly]

I 5starred a 311 and being 281 two wars ago, after the update. Don’t state that this is not possible. And I used neither four Vickers nor four Moto Gunners.

 

[TizJourney]

There are three types of players who to try to be competitive in the game:

• Buck whales
• Cheaters
• Idiots

Choose who you are.

 

[domifan]

There are three types of players who to try to be competitive in the game:

• Buck whales
• Cheaters
• Idiots

Choose who you are.

Some of those aren’t mutually exclusive

 

[sponge]

Lol, this only proves that spenders have zero skills. Chadwicke perhaps instead of all the spending, you should have learned to play the hard way. And stop being such a hypocrite, countless posts and rants about not spending a penny, and yet you are whining again about spending. Zero integrity, zero spine, zero balls.

 

[domifan]

Lol, this only proves that spenders have zero skills. Chadwicke perhaps instead of all the spending, you should have learned to play the hard way. And stop being such a hypocrite, countless posts and rants about not spending a penny, and yet you are whining again about spending. Zero integrity, zero spine, zero balls.

I don’t think Chadwicke is saying he’s spending, but rather being forced into that situation. That doesn’t mean he is spending, but rather just pointing out the costs involved.

 

[Stormicus]

If you are spending $50 per war then BHG have you right where they want you, and as long as you keep doing that, they aren’t going to change anything. They might kill the goose that is laying such lovely golden eggs. It is possible to have lots of fun in this game without spending any money at all, maybe you should try that.

 

[Chadwicke]

Exactly domifan to be war in war out competitive this is thr cost I'm pointing at as only people from the beginning can truly rate the degree of the shift in the game it's not one big move it's a serious of small ones that have caused this . I have spent alot Especially when the game was great and when I could buy what I wanted when i wanted. The alliance I lead has a mix of spenders and free to play players I see all angles of how these change have effected players for the last year and a half. When I speak here it's not about me it's about the players I see day in day out getting pushed aside for the changes. On a team players alll have a role and the game is on thr Verge of killing some of these roles. A good team has top end attackers , top end Defense middle offense and middle Defense, it has players that show up war I war out and do their best . The results are that of the team and thr roles they play . That's what I'm upset about that's why I come to forums in the first place..

 

[Boldy]

I Have spent in the game, to upgrade base.

I have spent zero dollars to play better war or better multiplayer. Zero money on troop cards or artifact.

At some stage I'd probably but an event pass, but, def not on a 3 day one costing 10 bucks a day, that's madness. The events need to be better and cost appropriately.

If one can't play attacking matches without spending, perhaps go find a simpler game, like FarmVille....

Nobody is forcing anybody to spend any money, period.