Wall Idea

[Lucid]

So the fact that walls are so expensive and ineffective with siege weapons I have an idea, with each upgrade the walls should grow in height, that way if you are spending a ridiculous amount of gold it would make sense and ensure that the invader has to deal with the wall rather than simply shoot over top of it.

 

[redprince]

You sound like a Trump supporter.

 

[Kraitok]

Build the wall (Nexon will pay for it)!

 

[Parmenion]

The many cheaters in the game will love that suggestion. Just imagine war then...

 

[Lucid]

HaHa thats funny

 

[Lucid]

If you spend hard earned gold on a wall it should be worth something rather than just a trivial item. Cheaters have many ways , this was a suggestion for the normal game players

 

[Parmenion]

Lucid - I see what you're saying but I've seen wars against alliances where many bases have max walls, which would make winning such wars impossible. A compromise could be lowering the damage dealt by rifleman against buildings inside of walls, weakening them per wall level. Not to say I want this to happen but it seems like a valid suggestion.

 

[Navalis]

Ohhhhhhhhh, hadn't thought of that spin on it. Damage reduction to shooters would be a very workable compromise! I must admit I hate that shooters can shot OVER walls however lol.
I have put a lot of gold into walls because I have seen how much it slows down invading armies. A high level wall in a key corner or intersection can be a star saver!

 

[Veldan]

In my opinion, a better idea would be to remove the ability of siege weapons and archers to shoot over walls entirely. Let it be a mortar exclusive thing. It would be more realistic, and greatly improve the usefulness of walls directly, and of mortars and airplanes indirectly.

 

[Vixen]

also ... If I pay one or three million for a wall I want it to be black and scary not bone and red!

 

[Manifesto]

I would like to see walls change into ramparts where defenders can shoot at attackers. Maybe they don't have the same damage as towers, maybe they do, idk, but they could have some cover from the rifles especially brits - they might not hurt the rifles as much but the rifles won't hurt them as much either. They'll also be closer to the attackers, while shooting, than the towers would.