War after war against these odds are just ridiculous

[sinner]

Come on this is killing us. Our highest age is industrial but yet all we get 95% of the time is a war against a minimum of four atomics and globals. It’s impossible to win when you get 100% against and there is no way we can touch those top dudes. So I am thinking you want us to rush to these higher ages and spend crowns to toughen up. Well I’m here to tell you that you would get more money from me if wars were fair. Why should I spend anything on a game that is so bad at war matching? Well I’m not going to. Last war we had 20 peeps and they had 8 globals and above. I have done the in game complaint and they give no good answer. If this is the way it’s gunna always be then just tell us so we can make plans to disband and move onto another game.

 

[Mcnasty]

And in this corner their #2 Mcnasty weighing in at 162xp and the challenger and their #2 weighing in at 204xp this should be a close one folks

 

[JMoney]

Depends. Do said Atomics have Atomic defenses? Do they have the missile silo? What level are these guys in comparison to your levels. I've seen an Industrial be lvl 180. That's basically a low level Atomic in level. Meanwhile there are tons of Atomics still going around with gunpowder age lvl walls, which are downright terrible.

 

[Equal]

level of the walls is equally proportial for the time the player has to play this game. i am lvl 205, but still with 9-11 lvl walls, because i have not enough time in a day to grind the thing. good for you (or bad i guess), that you can spend 2-3 hours every day playing this game instead of doing real life stuff. )

 

[sinner]

Look guys when we get 100 percented but if we through a full stronghold set of troop cards at their uppers we might be able to scrape up a three star. Even if they don’t have a misille silo they still have way more defenses for us to deal with. Seriously it’s like the browns trying to win against the patriots (Vikings fan btw). I just don’t get how in the Sam heck they can continually set us up like this. It’s demoralizing and I see us taking more time to even want to start another war. As a matter of fact I hardly see very much chat anymore. There is just not enough horsepower in an ia to five a damn fairly strong or maxed global or atomic. You would think that half the dang time we would get a war where we were the power alliance but it hardly ever happens.

 

[Equal]

some of you should just go global for the alliances benefits. or move on. i agree that recently wars are out of norm, but the only option here is to stop warring, or advance.

 

[NoMem Wilson]

Yoy should join an established alliance with some heavy bases of your own. And dont forget the iron age accounts. Seriously learn what effects war rank amd build to that

 

[sinner]

Thought I would get cute by doing a small 10v10 war and just have our ia's in it. 3 Atomics and 2 globals. 2 of them have silo's. Even though 3 of them seem to have about the same defensive power as our ia's I am sure that they have howitzers and bad ass tanks to destroy us.

 

[sinner]

Equal commented
Today, 03:49 AM


some of you should just go global for the alliances benefits. or move on. i agree that recently wars are out of norm, but the only option here is to stop warring, or advance.

We are actually already a level 8 alliance. Even though we get a lot of losses we until recently have always gone for getting the most xp as possible. Our war record is 98-49. Most all of our war wins came from before the big update. This has been happening ever since they apparently fixed it. lol. We started this alliance from the ground up. Bunch of us were sick of the engineering in Clash and started this game. Clash has fixed this problem for the most part and is much better as of late.
Playing a lot more Clash lately.
Peace out

 

[Manifesto]

Would you be complaining if this was 10 months later and you were AA?
Just keep persevering and soon you'll be the big hitter. The AA's you're facing now were themselves complaining a year ago.

 

[sinner]

Would you be complaining if this was 10 months later and you were AA?
Just keep persevering and soon you'll be the big hitter. The AA's you're facing now were themselves complaining a year ago.

I don't think the matchmaking was bad before the big update. Now that cold age is out I am sure our pain will last a lot longer now that this is the case. Also, we get low peeps to pop in a lot and when I try and put them in war to lower our weight it still doesn't make a bit of difference. Just get more aa's and ga's to go up against in those bigger wars. I can't figure it out. Guess I am beating a dead horse here but as long as we are hanging in there (how long is up to debate) I will complain about it. Otherwise how are they going to know there is a problem in our view?

 

[Equal]

well since the cwa release, our wars have been quite fair. just recently we had 2 wars in a row, where despite our opponents taking sandbags, our lvl's and strenght was way above theirs. last war our top 10 has about 25 lvl advantage over our opponents top 10, and they have a nice iron at the end. no clue why we even matched..

 

[Festivus]

There's a simple and totally free solution to OP's problem. Get 3-4 free google email accounts. Use them to create 3-4 accounts, advance them to iron age and stop. Include them in wars. You'll like the matches you get then much, much more.

 

[Vixen]

we are not getting any decent wars atm... sigh

 

[Manifesto]

There's nothing wrong with complaining, that's what the forum is for.
I'm just pointing out that as time goes on people upgrade and get stronger and progress while other players start afresh and become the young bases. It's a machine that's constantly 'churning'. Just keep moving!

 

[Manifesto]

What's decent about warring? I could state the obvious that alliances who sandbag want nothing better than to win easily. ​​​​​​​What's wrong with that?
Actually, I think the teams that face hard matches are the ones that gain the most, and I'm not talking about glory points!

 

[Vixen]

a decent war is where it is close and where nobody can bare to be offline and we all lose sleep...
we haven't had a war like that for a while

we are matching alliances way out of our league - yes we can practice on their bases but after back to back wars like this it is a moral killer
we are matching alliances where we are way out of their league - it's no fun doing this either and totally unfair on the enemy

 

[_Flash_]

To the OP, you might want to see if you're taking an approach of maxing out everything before moving to the next age. If so, you might want to relook at that approach.
As some of the people have pointed out, someone who has maxed out IA might bring in a similar weight to the war as an AA player. As you have noted already, higher ages unlock more defensive buildings, and offer better upgrades to troops.
So, it might not be a bad idea to age up and build some of those defenses and get those troop upgrades to deal with the wars better.
The movement from IA to Global offers a lot of attractive options: howitzer upgrade provides a huge jump to the DPS over artillery. You unlock the missile silo. And a lot more.
Aging up instead of maxing out IA might help in your case.
Hope this helps.
Cheers and happy gaming!

 

[sinner]

Flash thanks for the constructive idea. While our alliance is called Forever Rushed we are actually quite the opposite. We are maxing everything out in our current age. That is why most of us are stuck in ia because of all of the upgrades needed, especially in the university. Until this very moment I haven't even considered it but will look into this idea closely. Maybe just go there and work on my offense first then bring the defense along. Not sure how nexon is weighing specific things so don't know if adding defenses will add greatly to our total score or if it is a minimal effect.

 

[Vixen]

Totally agree with flash.... we used to max max max ... not w it is if you don’t need it don’t touch it philosophy