War loot when attacking down > 1 level

[Tsamu]

I think it doesn't make sense that war loot for a base is different depending on the level of the attacker. A base of a particular age should always be worth about the same. Also, the loot gained from the attack itself should be brought into line with what you could get from a multi-player battle on a base of that level. Here is my suggestion:

	War Loot (k)	Max Attack Loot (k)
	Food	Gold	Oil	Food	Gold	Oil
Iron	50	50		50	50
Classical	75	75		100	100
Medieval	125	125		150	150
Enlightenment	200	200	1	200	200	1
Industrial	300	300	1.5	250	250	1.5
Global	450	450	2.5	300	300	2
Atomic	700	700	4	350	350	2.5

This still encourages players to attack as high as possible, but doesn't penalize players who have to hit down.

I would also eliminate loser's war loot. The increased attack loot will compensate.

I didn't include rubies because I think they can remain as is (including losers loot), and would be a deterrent to attacking down.

 

[Loveandpower]

By your figures most of my attacks would be useless. I hit many EA and IA in MP daily as an IA base. Why should my 100k IA army only gain 300k food or less from a fight? If an IA base is just sitting there wih 700/700k of course I am going to ...help them with their savings. Putting restrictions on the maximum earned is unfair to those who train a strong army to use it.

Now if you are talking about "minimum loot" that may be one thing even though I don't honestly see Nexon doing that.

 

[RottPhiler]

It's about WW and not MP, but yes no "max attack loot". I'm completely agree that normalizing war loot is a good idea.