What is it? Bug - 2 Estates! Issues and bugs are never fixed in a reasonable amount of time? BHG do you care about your reputation at all?
- Thread starter Sega
- Start date
nobodyknowsthetrouble
Approved user
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Messages
- 101
場合によっては、BHG が誤って 2 つ販売したこともありました。 ただし、実際の通貨で購入したものであるため、それを持ち去るのはそう簡単ではありません。
Everywhere you look in the game anywhere there are issues and bugs. What a nightmare!
But BHG swears that it is aware of everything that is happening and is in control of the situation.
As far as I understand, for a long long time...The game in general is very good, worthy!... but there are nuances, the main one of which is the BHG development team
Last edited:
swordman03
Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
- Messages
- 59
yep some kind of glitch back in the day i had 24 houses (48 people) and the name was matrix glitch? those were the days i miss that account lol
Controlling the inadmissibility of 2 or more Estates is implemented quite simply. When purchasing an Estate, place a warning: “A player can have only one Estate at his Base (city). If you already have an Estate, we strongly recommend that you refuse to purchase. Otherwise, the excess Estate will soon be liquidated from your Base (city) without refund money spent. Thank you for your understanding."
And once a week (or in another way) run a script that checks the database of all players on the BHG servers and deletes unnecessary Estates. If it so happened that the developers were not able to implement a check for the presence of an Estate with the player at the time of purchasing the Estate.
Everything is quite elementary and simple... But this needs to be done.
P.S. Only I am afraid that in this case, "bugs may be happen" (in the case of BHG it should be called exactly that) - and people will begin to lose their only one Estate. Apparently this is what the BHG fears.
And once a week (or in another way) run a script that checks the database of all players on the BHG servers and deletes unnecessary Estates. If it so happened that the developers were not able to implement a check for the presence of an Estate with the player at the time of purchasing the Estate.
Everything is quite elementary and simple... But this needs to be done.
P.S. Only I am afraid that in this case, "bugs may be happen" (in the case of BHG it should be called exactly that) - and people will begin to lose their only one Estate. Apparently this is what the BHG fears.
Last edited:
Soon I will stop being surprised by any miracles and surprises.
From a mathematical point of view, any computer program is a deterministic (i.e. with predictable behavior) system. Although even here BHG found an excuse - they programs are artificial neural networks (this concerns excuses about the incorrect reproduction of battles, as they say), the behavior of which is difficult to predict. But not in the case when it is necessary to check the only sign - there is an Estate or not. BHG, someone deceived you, that this is impossible in the program!
Last edited:
nobodyknowsthetrouble
Approved user
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Messages
- 101
私の知る限り、そのような購入は現在不可能です。
しかし、当時はそのようなテキストは存在しませんでした。 金銭で支払われた商品を BHG が削除した場合、購入者は Google または Apple に連絡します。 これらの決済サービスは圧力を高める可能性があります。
最新の更新プログラムのエラー率を考慮すると、すべての法的資産の半分が消滅しても不思議ではありません。
しかし、当時はそのようなテキストは存在しませんでした。 金銭で支払われた商品を BHG が削除した場合、購入者は Google または Apple に連絡します。 これらの決済サービスは圧力を高める可能性があります。
最新の更新プログラムのエラー率を考慮すると、すべての法的資産の半分が消滅しても不思議ではありません。
BHG, it seems to me that your development team has people who are “putting noodles on your ears” by convincing you that something is impossible to implement in the program, and then you have to listen to reproaches and ridicule from the players. Isn't it time to audit and monitor the professional suitability of your programmers and task managers? You are losing your reputation! I haven’t been observing this whole mess for long, but I’ve already drawn some unflattering conclusions. Yes, there are complex errors, but even the most basic correctable errors have existed in the game for a long time. Do you feel like someone on your team is “eating their bread in vain”?
Guys, it is important for you to understand that the more popular your product becomes, the more demanding and critical players you will encounter, especially those who pay real money - and they are absolutely right! Your game is no longer some kind of handicraft development, but a commercial product, with all the ensuing consequences. You need to be more strict and attentive to development of the game.
Believe me, you are still very lucky that only a small part of all players are present on this forum and take an active part in the discussion of the game. And you shouldn’t naively assume that everyone else is happy with everything. Have you ever thought that many dissatisfied people simply silently leave the game?
I'm in no way trying to tell you what to do - it's up to only you guys to decide!
P.S. Hint. Analyze forum posts and identify issues and bugs that users have been talking about for a long time and that still exist. Identify the most obvious and easy to fix ones - try to fix them as soon as possible - thereby you will weaken the players’ negative feelings towards you, and you will have additional resources to solve more complex issues. Find out the reason why issues and bugs exist for so long and are not corrected - sometimes programmers only pretend to be overloaded with work and immersed in a complex thought process, busy with scientific research and finding solutions, but often this only indicates insufficient qualifications, lack of knowledge and experience of the programmer, who is simply unable to solve the task, but at the same time does not refuse it in fear of admitting his own incompetence and professional unsuitability. Such is the specificity of a programmer’s work - few people can understand what he is really doing. All other issues and bugs that are difficult to fix should be entrusted only to strong programmers.
P.P.S. Just for fun, just query your player database to see the number of players who have too many houses and more than one Estate. This is not a difficult task at all. You will at least be able to assess the scale of the problem.
Guys, it is important for you to understand that the more popular your product becomes, the more demanding and critical players you will encounter, especially those who pay real money - and they are absolutely right! Your game is no longer some kind of handicraft development, but a commercial product, with all the ensuing consequences. You need to be more strict and attentive to development of the game.
Believe me, you are still very lucky that only a small part of all players are present on this forum and take an active part in the discussion of the game. And you shouldn’t naively assume that everyone else is happy with everything. Have you ever thought that many dissatisfied people simply silently leave the game?
I'm in no way trying to tell you what to do - it's up to only you guys to decide!
P.S. Hint. Analyze forum posts and identify issues and bugs that users have been talking about for a long time and that still exist. Identify the most obvious and easy to fix ones - try to fix them as soon as possible - thereby you will weaken the players’ negative feelings towards you, and you will have additional resources to solve more complex issues. Find out the reason why issues and bugs exist for so long and are not corrected - sometimes programmers only pretend to be overloaded with work and immersed in a complex thought process, busy with scientific research and finding solutions, but often this only indicates insufficient qualifications, lack of knowledge and experience of the programmer, who is simply unable to solve the task, but at the same time does not refuse it in fear of admitting his own incompetence and professional unsuitability. Such is the specificity of a programmer’s work - few people can understand what he is really doing. All other issues and bugs that are difficult to fix should be entrusted only to strong programmers.
P.P.S. Just for fun, just query your player database to see the number of players who have too many houses and more than one Estate. This is not a difficult task at all. You will at least be able to assess the scale of the problem.
Last edited:
This asset is not legal, because is against the rules of the game. Neither Google nor Apple has the right to indicate! (Although it is very USA style to tell everyone else how to live.) The game has its own laws - RULES of the game.
Updates = bug fixes. I'm happy about every game update.
Don’t come up with additional excuses for BHG - they cope with it successfully themselves
P.S. As a compensation for moral damage, as a last resort, BHG can simply provide a package of accelerations to the “injured” player for an equivalent amount - and the issue is completely settled - the service for the specified amount has been provided and, most importantly, does not contradict the rules of the game. Do Google and Apple still have any questions?
Last edited:
BHG, I propose to give this BUG in the game the official name “Gift of Fate”! And it’s easier for you - you don’t have to make excuses until you find a solution - as you know, you can’t escape Fate, that’s what they sometimes say. So, Happiness falls on someone’s head (by definition, as usually, you have nothing to do with it at all) - for someone in the form of too many houses, for someone in the form of more than one Estates - not everyone is so lucky in life, but Wonders sometimes happen!
P.S. Hmmm... Just now I noticed... BHG is very close in spelling to BUG... So maybe this is the issue too?
P.P.S. I apologize for such a critical tone of statements, but such obvious, not difficult to correct, but still uncorrected bug discourage me and leave me completely bewildered
P.S. Hmmm... Just now I noticed... BHG is very close in spelling to BUG... So maybe this is the issue too?
P.P.S. I apologize for such a critical tone of statements, but such obvious, not difficult to correct, but still uncorrected bug discourage me and leave me completely bewildered
Last edited:
nobodyknowsthetrouble
Approved user
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Messages
- 101
リラックス
それはあなたを傷つけません。 これでは攻撃にも防御にも何のメリットもありません。 博物館の機能、変動する同盟特典など、他にも重要な問題がたくさんあります。
それはあなたを傷つけません。 これでは攻撃にも防御にも何のメリットもありません。 博物館の機能、変動する同盟特典など、他にも重要な問題がたくさんあります。
I don't bother. You see, I’m not talking about any personal infringement of my rights in the game, I’m talking about equality for all players, let’s say, about justice. For me, for example, the number of citizens is very important, because this gives me a significant advantage in development and, as a result, achieving great results both in defense and in weapons. There are no problems with resources in the game at all, but it takes a lot of time. And the citizens are just a direct embodiment of the fact that you can use your time more profitably. If suddenly this is not clear anyway.
A simple example. We are improving the Anti-Tank Gun - you need 3 citizens for a certain time. You have 1 Estate, the enemy has 2 Estates. During the same time, who will receive 2 times more improved Anti-Tank Guns? So much for direct superiority in defense.
If I had the opportunity to hire more citizens (I already have the maximum possible - China, the Opera House and the Estate are all just for the sake of the citizens), then I would not bother with nonsense and not invest endless resources into building walls (this is not thought out in the game at all - there is nowhere to invest resources except walls when all citizens (except one) are busy), but would have taken up much more useful buildings. The number of citizens is a very significant advantage!
More important: What's perplexing to me is not the presence of issues and bugs, but rather how long they remain in the game unsolved. This bug is just a special case. After all, people report them, but, as I understand from reading the forum, then nothing changes for a long time. I’m generally silent about the “Ideas & Features Requests” - they don’t seem to pay attention to that "chatter" at all.
I was once surprised by a reply when a player wrote something like “You are seriously? Is this still there? I reported this six months ago, and this little thing still hasn’t been fixed?” And in that case, there really wasn’t that much that needed to be corrected.
Last edited:
