World War loot completely NOT worth the effort? Please increase the loots

Lotrofanatic

Approved user
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
24
Totally agree with th OP 100%

You should at least recoup your expenditure at the end of the war. I.e you get what you paid as the war loot.

And double your war loot if your team wins the war overall.
 

Xenno

Approved user
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Messages
19
The only issue I have with the recouping. Is some of us, primarily the atomic and global ager donate alot of troop to defence, then on top of their attacks. How much do you value their contribution to the win or does that they donated the troop not count and they get a your a wonder guy or gal speech.
 

Green Bird

Approved user
Joined
Jun 27, 2017
Messages
183
I tend to agree that the war loot rewards ought to be reviewed. Specifically, oil. It should be brought in line percentage wise with food and gold. Basically, if one gets about 10% of storage capacity of one why not the other? 20k oil would be a reasonable reward for a Global player. At the same time, I do not think that a donation activity should be compensated. It is an act of volunteering in the spirit of a good alliance member.
 

Funken_A

Approved user
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
306
Yep. Unless I'm going to see a huge increase in resources coming in for fighting wars I won't bother. Time to brew is expensive and the amount of resources need is just work..

I quit my alliance because it was hampering my ability to quickly advance. This game has too much going on and its a huge haul to begin with, the $50 for a luxury townhome and the cost of war just serves the purpose of turning people away from the game.

Not going to buy my way through a game and sure as hell not going to participate in wars that give pretty much no rewards for the work after you subtract costs and time
 
Top