Cheating in world war

[nobodyknowsthetrouble]

Battle Reports [...] then we know what hit us accurately

That is a completely different topic. That doesn't exist yet!
What you probably mean is the summary at the end of the replay. But that's not supposed to show what attacked you, but rather what died during the replay (attack). (indicated by the headline "Troops Lost"). If an Automation Age attacks an Iron Age, the summary is empty because no troops die at all.

If you want to see the attacker's entire army, then this is a feature request, as it has nothing at all to do with the existing (flawed) system.

 

[Seek]

That is a completely different topic. That doesn't exist yet!
What you probably mean is the summary at the end of the replay. But that's not supposed to show what attacked you, but rather what died during the replay (attack). (indicated by the headline "Troops Lost"). If an Automation Age attacks an Iron Age, the summary is empty because no troops die at all.

If you want to see the attacker's entire army, then this is a feature request, as it has nothing at all to do with the existing (flawed) system.

In game Replay and In game Battle Report are currently Tied together. So stop with your off topic.

Well it’s called battle report in the game. I know it depicts troops lost but when you contact CS team and the in game battle report is wrong they say trust us the Battle Log shows all that was used. Well since in game battle report is broke I said give us their battle log as our in game battle report ie instead of just a broke battle report tied to broke replay system. ( Also why not show everything used in battle unless your covering up cheating)

That’s not requesting a feature change it is giving a suggestion to fix what is broke in game that makes people think cheating is happening.

 

[nobodyknowsthetrouble]

In game Replay and In game Battle Report are currently Tied together. So stop with your off topic.

Well it’s called battle report in the game. I know it depicts troops lost but when you contact CS team and the in game battle report is wrong they say trust us the Battle Log shows all that was used. Well since in game battle report is broke I said give us their battle log as our in game battle report ie instead of just a broke battle report tied to broke replay system. ( Also why not show everything used in battle unless your covering up cheating)

That’s not requesting a feature change it is giving a suggestion to fix what is broke in game that makes people think cheating is happening.

Still madd respect for you nobodyknowsthetrouble one of the smartest players and thread contributors on the real.

I have a big problem with the wording. I can't find the word "battle report" anywhere, but even if I'm just blind, then it is still wrong to call it a “report” (that shows what hit us). It is just a summary of the replay that was previously generated on your device. That's why you can't see this summary without watching the replay first.
The CS says to trust the stars on the world map; not the replay and not its summary. Only the map shows stars and percentages correctly - but no troops are shown there.
So there is no battle report (for war) at all, there is only an on-the-fly generated list of “Troops Lost”! Only in the rare cases with no surviving troops will "Troops lost" and "battle report" mean the same thing.
In contrast, there is a "battle report" for the multiplayer. The defense log shows what attacked you. The replay summary shows what died. Since this works for multiplayer, it shouldn't be too difficult to build a similar system for war. I also believe that such a report is interesting and should definitely be added. I would also like to see the "Troops lost" directly underneath, so that you can see that 17 of the 20 rifles used died. But please don't mix this with the replays. This means we want is a completely new report that is transmitted to our devices. A report that is not based on the generated replay. This is and remains something completely different than what has existed before. This is not a fix for the existing broken replay system, this is a new feature.

 

[Seek]

Well forget it then worry about someone else post.(FYI title of thread Cheating World War so offering a fix to broken system is on topic)
When you contact dang CS they say the are combined so fix dang replay.

Give us Battle Log since BHG can not fix replay system / battle report that way we know what actually hit us is legit. How is that for wording.

 

[King Crimson]

As we've said before, you won't always receive an immediate reply. It is possible that you may not receive a reply for cheat reports, regardless if any action was taken.

I understand how frustrating this can be, the replay system is a deeply rooted part of the game that takes quite a bit of work to tackle. Reporting helps the team find a direct answer as they continue to tinker at the replay system, I know this is a LONG standing issue, but not reporting it each time it happens does more harm than good.

To paraphrase @nobodyknowsthetrouble , your team might not control the issue in players' complaints but they do control the type of response to players' complaints.

 

[Seek]

My issue with entire thing is we are complaining about an issue that should have been fixed before Dominations even launched 9 years ago.

This has created big mistrust of BHG, totally destroyed CS team creditability, false cheating claimed , resentments of groups of players , cheaters going free and much more.

We are to point I think someone above the CS and Forum mods needs to address the entire community. We deserve real answers from someone with power to actually make it happen. Transparency and accountability on fixing major known issues and actual timeline for fixes. The replay system needs to be 100% never should a player see inaccurate replays all this does is create doubt if the hit is legit or if game is even legit.

There has been absolutely zero done to show the work BHG says it’s doing to fix replays so put up or shut up time BHG.

Having a member of BHG actual management not poor CS or Forum mod taking heat for them. Get someone on here that can do something and give real answers.