pckrn
I've seen that figure before, including the poll you created, but never questioned it before because l put it down, rightly or wrongly, to the usual scaremongering/emotion response. I finally asked for clarification because l was losing patience seeing this nonsensical figure bandied about.
In any case, I'm sure there are plenty of people following you because, even though we don't always agree, your posts are always intelligent, and l seriously doubt the people interested in you are gullible.
Ultimately l prefer to get my comfirmation from playing the game, not from the forum. My AR is level 3 and l dont think it's as OP as people think. I used a max of 4 in a few experimental matches and they were quick wins but I'm generally winning matches around 100secs and usually without any tactics, so the use of 4 didn't blow me away. As a personal rule, l never carry more than 2 or 3 of any type of tactic. Any more is a waste.
Regardless of whether l used 4 or 7, isn't a good, quick win the goal of the game? Especially for mp, so you can get back to raiding as soon as possible?
And I'm always interested in a discussion if l can bring a different or unexplored view to the discussion. It's sad that people often react to my 'saying something different' instead of reading what's being said. Especially the people who only care about wars. They seem less tolerant of the mp players than vice versa, yet all this time no one has asked for an AR nerf just for wars while leaving mp alone (if that's even possible). People who war seem to have no other vision.
Still won't stop me exploring other viewpoints.