From Atomic age, Storehouse Trade good capacity be double from 28 to 56?

Gears

Approved user
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
123
*Important Edit - Based on replies, doubling would be too high so discuss based on the edited details of this post instead of thread title.

From Atomic age onwards, Storehouse Trade good capacity should be increased by 10-12* as an Atomic age feature of technological advancement and increased productions and not just restrict it to cosmetic upgrade from Global age while increasing the capacity by only 2.

Just cosmetic changes for Storehouse from Atomic age doesn't make up for the high cost of Atomic Age Mercenary troops, Air Superiority Blessing**, War Coalitions.

From Atomic Age and Cold War age, powerful mercenary troops like Tanks require 8 Cider/Metal to recruit which are necessary in World War. Recruiting 3 Tank Destroyers for 2 chances in war requires 24 x 2=48 Cider while recruiting 4 T-62 Tanks per war requires 32 Metal.

Enabling Higher level Coalitions for every war also requires more National Trade Goods(NTGs) and if your Storehouse is full, all the NTGs you collect after 5-star victories are wasted and not even transferred to your Inventory.

So from Atomic age onwards,Storehouse Capacity increment by 10-12* will be quite helpful to regular participants in World War and it will also encourage more players to regularly participate in World wars.

**Air Superiority Blessing is often ignored by most players in Multiplayer battles who regularly participate in World wars due to High Diamond cost as Diamonds are very important for Mercenary troops and Training blessings.

Post replies in this thread if you are for it, have better suggestion or against it and do state reasons if you are against it.

*Important Edit - Based on replies, doubling would be too high so discuss based on the edited details of this post instead of thread title.
 
Last edited:

Pretty

Approved user
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
10
Increasing the capacity would lead to less pain dropping merc’s and buying coalitions.
 

Cannibals

Approved user
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
605
So your reasoning to increase the limit is so that no one will have to make choices how to best spend scarce capacity?
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
'' and it will also encourage more players to regularly participate in World wars.''
Nexon is relying on people who war regularly to battle regularly for ntgs.
As soon as you lose them you have to get them, so l can't see them implementing your suggestion.
You'd have a better chance asking for an extra 20 or 25% increase.
 

Pretty

Approved user
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
10
You still have to earn the ntg’s which is the hard part. So many are wasted when the inventory is full it makes sense to increase it. People will still have to make hard choices and fight many battles.
 

Cannibals

Approved user
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
605
So it will encourage more players to regularly participate in World Wars when everyone has stockpiles of NTGs? When everyone has coalitions bonuses then no one has them, relatively speaking. Perhaps if coalitions become more common, then players without them will be less likely to participate knowing that everyone has them?
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
Does it matter that you're losing NTGs if you have a full storehouse?
If your inventory is full it means you have enough to buy some coalitions, yes? If you already have coalitions then your storehouse will be full for next time when you need coalitions. So you're good either way. :D
I think the real issue is that NTGs should be much easier to get, so the next time you need to fill your storehouse it's not such a grind and people won't need to fight so many battles.
 

Gears

Approved user
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
123
For me, NTGs scarcity is forced because you are unable to save the excess NTGs available after every 5-star victories, Increasing the capacity by 10-12 would he helpful for players who regularly participate in war who choose to not upgrade important Coalitions or opt out of war because they don't have the required no. of NTGs to enable the right Coalitions.
 

Gears

Approved user
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
123
I agree, an increment by additional 10-12 instead of doubling would be better.
 
Last edited:
Top