Match Making has been Decent from last 10 days

[jagadeeshgarapati]

Hi BHG_Muet , TinSoldier ,
Thank you if you had done some tweaks in war match ups. most alliances i know are having good feedback from last 10 days. please don't change anything in next update about the war match up. Since you guys deployed server side changes required for Digital age recently. and match making changes are done on server side. if you have deployed match making changes with intent or not. please keep them.

 

[Spaceboy]

what ?? Our matches of the last 2 weeks have been horrible, and we kept the same team on our side. It is always the same scenario: their top 3-4 can easily 5* our 6-8 top bases, while we cannot do that. Probably a lot of cheating or maxed museums in the equation, that is the only reason I see to explain it.

 

[Xabar]

jagadeeshgarapati. The match making is only working well for alliances with a hight number of a high SA players, It is still seriusly bad for ones that not have too many high level players

 

[jagadeeshgarapati]

hi xabar, we have mix of all ages and low on SA players. in a 20v war we have 5 SA, 6 CWA, 5 AA,4 lower.

 

[jagadeeshgarapati]

sorry that you are facing cheaters. but that was not this is about. just that match making is giving decent team matches. museum and cheating is unrelated to match making.

 

[Xabar]

Hi, jagadeeshgarapati
Exactly for that you have better match making, you have a distribution of Ages over the media in your top players
There are about 5000 active Alliances:
About of:
20.000 SA
31.000 CWA
110.000 AA
An average Alliance have:
4 SA
6 CWA

 

[joelegiao]

Something i notice in our ally is that we usually have 4-5 good wars in a row than get 3 impossible ones... Its been like that for a while

 

[Chadwicke]

Yes it's easy harder completely impossible slightly impossible , too hard to try after 2 losses to no chance teams , easy , easier , new level of impossible, completely impossible , hard but it's going to be expensive , 3 losses in a row easy war and repeat

 

[Scuba]

This is just complete fluke for the last 10 days.

Will this change: Yes

Will you be happy about it: I doubt it

 

[Boldy]

Our wars go,
impossible
Impossible
Good match up
Repeat

 

[Berend_War]

Same for us, not many mis matched wars. But only if you look at ages.
Looks like university research / museum / library and upgrading the defensive buildings make the difference.

 

[King Crimson]

Matchmaking has been decent in the last 10 days? Maybe for you but then you must qualify your statement.
People always say something is ''so'' because it happens to them. You're not the only person playing the game. There are lots of players still suffering from the mismatches.
What you should say is matchmaking has been decent ''for me''.

 

[Mountainking]

edited out

 

[Kanechoigo]

The incorrect war weight calculation caused war matching terrible, you got good matching doesn’t represent anything of this issue , if 100% maxed SA still sit under CWA, that means nothing has been solved

 

[Theoneandonly]

Give him his time to bless BHG, he is doing it that way everywhere. Also he always concludes from his experience to the whole community. And tbh nothing of his experience was ever shown proven, I asked him several times therefore. He is only claiming positions without showing any facts. For him it is also common that two attacks from one player in one war have the same attack time.

 

[Boldy]

The Old sandbagging matchmaking was worse for sure. The amount of time we were in a war with 500:1 to 1000:1 odds, rediculous.
worst odds I've seen since new method is 50:1 with a large volume around 5:1 to 10:1 odds.
10:1 odds is basically you're only playing for perk points and don't attack their top 4-6 bases.
5:1 odds you attack nearly everybody and still, playing for perk points vs winning.