No excuse not to fix the AR this week

Horsepower

Approved user
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
439
BHG, please do not roll out the new matchmaking system and leave the Assault Rally as is. Take this 55 hour break to fix-nerf the AR. Right now the AR is the one element of the game which is destroying the war experience. You should have more then enough data combined with numerous players complaining. We need defense to matter again. Presently there is no challenge in war at all. It’s actually gotten boring and there is no longer a reason to upgrade defense.

Don’t put this off. Fix this this week. Thank you
 

Xabar

Approved user
Joined
Dec 9, 2017
Messages
456
TinSoldier BHG_Muet . Improving defenses are totally desestimulated. The tactic Stats overloaded.
​​​​​​​
I am fullyagree.
-The actual AR (90%), protect more than a Protec Tactic (50%). The protect efect of AR have to be lower than 25% or 0%. To make the Protec useful again (Damage reduction)
-The duration is exagerated too.
-The speed boost at 170% is too much. 100% at level 4 tactic.
-Attack Speed Increase have to be lowered
-Damage Increase have to be 100% at level 4 tactic.
****But, you can convine the AR with a Protect

Ex. Level 1:
-Damage reduction: 5% (+5%/level)
-Duration: 9 seg (+1seg/level)
-Speed boost: 70% (+10%/level)
-Attack Speed: 30% (-5%/level)
​​​​​​​-Damage Increase: 70% (+10%/level)

Ex. Level 4:
-Damage reduction: 20%
-Duration: 12 seg
-Speed boost: 100%
-Attack Speed: 15%
-Damage Increase: 100%
 

TinSoldier

New member
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
1,568
The team will be able to rebalance this Tactic when the next update is released. (We need to include both client and server changes.) We've seen a lot great suggestions on how to make these changes, and dug into the analytics on how it's currently being used.

Thanks!
 

martyr

Approved user
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
13
TinSoldier BHG_Muet do we have a timeline for the next update when we can see this AR tactic to be fixed. I have a 300 level base with near max university and it takes 60 seconds for people to crush that base even when 3D. U can imagine the plight of defenders at present, cos whether you are 3D or 2D or 1D really don't matter. Even the biggest museums are no match to the boosts given by current statistics of the tactic. You will have to bring the tactic stats at level 4 down to half of its current levels, maybe lesser. Hope we get a straightforward response on the time line, cos this tactic has taken the fun out of being a defender or an attacker to be honest. Attack results depend more on fastest fingers & number of AR tactics used than skills and planning.
 

Manifesto

Approved user
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
1,920
On behalf of the non-warring players: :p
Tbh, when a high level player can be beaten so easily l can see the desperation. However, wars are not the be-all and end-all of this game. Try to have some perspective for others playing this game.
Not too much to ask for, is it?
 

moriador

Approved user
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Messages
29
BHG, please don't rush out changes without testing them thoroughly to know the consequences.

Also BHG, please rush out this change immediately because I what it to do what I think it will do.

Also BHG I'd like to have some cake and eat it too.
 

No Angel

Approved user
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
1,386
I'm concerned with what exactly the players want TinSoldier 😕
Please don't rush it. You need some testers to find the correct formula. Also the whole rights to change anything in the game is on you developer. Remember, not every complain here describes the whole game.
Whatever changes you bring into, I and a whole lot more mind sense players will take them, as long as they're made with good will 😊
 

Ch0s3nByG0dz

Approved user
Joined
Mar 19, 2019
Messages
58
The way I see it, the moment assault rally is fixes, the forums will be flooded with - oh, now you ruined the game again, assault rally is useless. :D

To be honest, only high level players in strong alliances complain. I have seen many high levels that have no clue what to do with it and fail. It was also because of them that a rebalance was added to buff defences, because the majority of players were already bad attackers in the first place who struggled with 5 stars, now they either dont touch high level bases or fail badly.

So the real question is this - should BHG listen to this small pool of high level players and take actions because of them? Some of those people take themselves way too seriously, like, hey look, we in a top alliance, we on discord, we on the forum, we so famous, that we are everywhere! Our opinion is the right one!

Who says so? Do you know how many players are there outside your “godlike” circle? If BHG wants to ask the community, they should do it in an in-game poll, not outside where only people from 10 alliances, who previously talked to each ither, express their opinion?

But what about to those who consider themselves more intelligent than the others? Those that have in-depth knowledge and value their opinion above others? Should assault rally be fixed because they said so?

How do you chose president? The voting is available to EVERYONE. Poor, rich, stupid, intelligent, black, white, asian it doesnt matter. So instead of listening to 10 people and filling their demands, BHG should start inserting in-game polls to ask for opinion, because believe me the results from that poll will be much different than what people demand here.

I put my vote to leave assault rally as it is. Oh but wait, my opinion doesnt matter because i havent paid thousands for defences and i do not play in a top 100 alliance. :D

GTFOH
 

Kev'sEmpire

Approved user
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Messages
21
As I have said before, I am a defender however I am happy to put up with the current situation for the development team to throughly test whatever they plan to do with the AR tactic. All I ask is that it is throughly tested for other side effects that my not be intentional with the changes they make. I have played this game from the about the start and I have witnessed too many rushed untested changes. We do need a solution however one that has had any consequences of the change understood and modified to limit any unintentional effects.
 

JustAnotherPlayer

Approved user
Joined
Apr 7, 2019
Messages
117
I hope AR remains status quo. I love watching replays of my maxed base being 2 starred sometimes 4 starred if attacker uses 4 TT while I sip Dom Perignon and playing my Stradivarius.
 

LordStark263AC

Approved user
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
875
Ikr, watching maxed out CWA bases with 3D being taken apart in 40 seconds. What a spectacle!
 

Mixie

Approved user
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
124
What kind of post is this, are you Nexon's stakeholders? Leave these guys work, would you? No wonder our ideas were never implemented. Cause you are flooding the forum with ridiculous AR topic over and over again. Remember rebalance period? You are all survivors. AR is a small element in the game and you couldn't even cope with it?! SMH :confused:
 

pckrn

Approved user
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
666
AR is not a small change. its just as game changing as, maybe even more than, all 4 rebalance stages put together, except in the other direction
 

Cris 4321

Approved user
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
54
TinSoldier BHG_Muet i agree assault rally needs to be fixed asap and after testing. You know the tactic is broken when the community starts discussing 0ar wars to make wars more challenging rather than hv max 3d bases taken out in 60-70 secs. Personally I have not played in any war since this was introduced.

Regarding some other comments from either occasional/ casual or lower level players to leave the tactic unchanged, sorry, i have no sympathy. I can understand why atomic players would enjoy taking out high level space age defensive bases (fun to vent frustrations in this manner isnt it, but if i may suggest as an alternative candy crush!) but i dont think thats sustainable long term with no incentive for defenders whatsoever. Similarly if people find raiding with this tactic easier, i can understand that but that's not the purpose of the tactic, if people want faster resources nexon can change the requirement for upgrades or increase resource generation, etc. Lastly as a disclaimer i am not a defender (certainly not a top one) but want to make this request given wars have completely lost their spark since this tactic was overpowered, i simply dont find it fun or challenging to track entire top team wars along the 1min average destruction/base.
 
Last edited:

Kev'sEmpire

Approved user
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Messages
21
Totally agree with you chris, averages of a minute across a team of bases is not what wars are about.

PS I love the Candy Crush comment
 
Top