Please bring back 25 person wars

[Chadwicke]

I believe there is more alliances that need 25 in war than actually needed 15

 

[helix900]

Absolutely! I´d vote for that

 

[No Angel]

No there are a lot more of smaller alliances than established alliances

 

[Mountainking]

No thanks 10 chars

 

[Tsamu]

I agree, 25 player wars should be replace both 20 and 30, and 40 should be restored too. That would make a nice progression, with the gap increasing by 5 each time (10, 15, 25, 40).

 

[BeerMan]

If I had a vote, I would keep 15, 20, 25, and 30, and get rid of 10v10.

 

[Rogue Squirrel]

Everybody seems to have different opinions on which options are the best based on how many people are actively participating in wars in their own alliance. But Nexon already had the stats on which were the most common searches so they must have picked the most popular. If we reinstate 25 and 35 again we risk worsening the already difficult matchmaking process

Nexon restricted the available slots to try and make matchmaking fairer (too many people starting wars at different times with different numbers of people makes it much harder to find a good match)

I think they should actually go further and have all wars starting at the same times each day. Say, for example at 0000hrs, 0600hrs, 1200hrs 1800hrs in a 24 hour period. I think this would lead to much better matches. You have 24 hours in which to make your two attacks so it shouldn't cause too much of a problem for most players, especially now we've got free retrain. At the moment if you wait longer than half an hour for a match (which we almost always do) you usually end up with a ridiculously one-sided war

 

[Cannibals]

Add a Merc Option ... unaffiliated players opt in to war and are thrown together in a pickup alliance for one battle

 

[phil_dee]

^^^^ this is brilliant

 

[joelegiao]

Problem is in our case matchmaking has never been that bad like right now... So i doubt it can be worst

 

[LordStark263AC]

Interesting idea. I like it.

 

[LordStark263AC]

New/small alliances need 10vs10 Wars.

 

[LordStark263AC]

Bring back 5vs5.

 

[Bootney Lee Fonsworth]

I'd definitely bring back 40s, though I'd imagine the amount of repeat opponents in those had to be high even during the game's heyday. 25s I can take or leave at this point as we've been in quite a groove with 30s lately.

Honestly the game needs some sort of global chat, even though those tend to be a wretched hive of scum and villainy in most games. This game isn't dying by any means but its base has certainly gotten more narrow and dedicated over the years. So with that said a global chat, perhaps only open to leaders and coleaders, may actually help with consolidation of some of these smaller alliances, if they are so inclined. Between all the third party chat apps, varying levels of engagement on myriad social media platforms and the company's lack of efforts behind the game's very own official forum there needs to be a universal way for all players who are so inclined to communicate. Limiting it to leaders/coleaders may keep some of the ''send ****s''-style garbage prevalent in most games' global chat down to a tolerable level as well.

Eta: Really? This forum censors ''nood''? The censorship here and in-game has gotten so heavyhanded and laughable it is beyond parody by now. The filter censors stuff that wouldn't raise an eyebrow on Nickelodeon at 3 in the afternoon. That's another post though. Just dryly amusing to me.