Poll : tactics reduction

[BKViper]

Horrible idea, unless they actually address sandbagging.
But they continue to ignore that, even though the community has been screaming about it for over a year.
And even though the solution is so simple it would take them 2 seconds to make the change...1 attack per player per war.

 

[British Coffee]

I think I forgot to mention good layout but still, how do you manage to 5 star fully developed base above your own age without p2w troop tactics after EA? I'm actually curious.

 

[King Barbs]

The reduction in tactics and the issue of Sandbaggers are completely separate and shouldn't be linked

 

[Angel forever]

For no major changes this seems to be a major change. Thanks for thinking this one through! Buy the way offense sells

 

[Kam1983]

They don't give a damn about the balance. They just want to encourage players to buy troop cards. " Let's pay to win wars".

 

[SebQuattro]

Buy the way offense sells

BHG is hoping so. Someone at Nexon probably thinks if you make it so players have to buy tactics to win battles, they will sell many more tactics.

 

[Angel forever]

I nkrmsiwould agree but if people have to pay to win it's likely there's way less that do that

 

[Capricorn]

I have been playing Domi since may 2015, and from day one I knew sabotage and protect was the direction I wanted to go in research in the armory, and now with Leo and the University. So by you at Nexon making those two a two slot tactic it weakens my attack and defense because of all the builders I had to sacrifice due to the University research under Leo. I think you guys are wrong in your thoughts of balance. You build something only to take it away from your loyalist players. I guess I wasted enough money and time on Dominations...thanks.

 

[Capricorn]

Well said!

 

[Capricorn]

Horrible Idea!

work on the AI with supply carts instead. You guys at nexon have more to work on then keeping 5 star victories to a minimum. You built this. We are simply the hampsters in your cage.

 

[Sir Pizzuoff]

Through a well thought out plan, and a well executed attack. It's not an anomaly; it's done pretty regularly.

 

[Spaceboy]

Results are without further comment : 80% of the voters are against this tactics reduction feature. So Nexon, what are you going to do about that ?

 

[Zipo06]

Results are without further comment : 80% of the voters are against this tactics reduction feature. So Nexon, what are you going to do about that ?

They don't care. They only want us to buy bonus units

 

[Visenya]

We wouldn't need so much "balance" if we didn't have the stronghold or the coalition troops, neither of which I recall anyone asking for. I'd give up both in a heartbeat if tactics would go back to being useful.

 

[Manifesto]

mmm, guessing ''not a whole lot'' !!

 

[True God]

Results are without further comment : 80% of the voters are against this tactics reduction feature. So Nexon, what are you going to do about that ?

I'm going to take a stab in the dark. Nothing.

 

[kennynguyen]

I was bored to see korea/british with full 6/7 sabotage and clean any base like nothing there (bcos of max 4 mortar). Vote for the change and believe it wl make the game or WW more challenge and more balance btw different nations. My main acc Roman and 2nd acc Korea.

 

[Imipolex]

No more cash to them, and maybe that and the disappearing players will eventually get their attention. One foot out the door for me, times 5. And no mo $$ for them.

 

[Imipolex]

So do not buy. Some signs of cratering interest, and hopefully $$ since the update. As said, it's all about the money, so if we all speak via wallet....

 

[Spaceboy]

Possible but the problem is with weak defenses or too strong nations, not with the fact that you have 4-5 tactics. They could have lowered the damage done by those tactics. Not by cutting them in half. They are balancing everything towards defenses now, cause there lies the $$$$.