Time in World War

[Mikar70]

We are faced with such a problem.
After taking into account the time at the maximum points in the World War, time was taken into account, our atomic age was forced to attack the weaker opponents in full force, in order to reduce the total time of the attack.
This is insanity, when 15 people were forced to wake up at night and attack in the last hour of the war, to reduce the total time.

The war has turned into a race for time, our non-atomic forces do not have any sense in attacking, since they, though they will take their 5 stars, but the atomic age, will have to attack again. (We, in order not to lose 1000 of fame, had to lose about 7 minutes in 15 attacks.
Leave a draw with the maximum number of stars.
In this case, the weaker alliance will have a chance to draw, otherwise, the weaker alliance does not make sense to go out to war, because they will attack 100% slower.

 

[Hyhyhy]

So the weaker alliance loose and the stronger wins, that is fair and that what War is all about!

 

[kennynguyen]

This is what i call "pay2win". To reduce attack duration, you must throw everything you have incl troop, merc, donated troops and troop cards. And for defences, you also put all troop cards to SH to prevent quick attack.

 

[Wendy]

would be fair if the game wasn't affected by sandbagging and crazy world war ranking, do you know what i'm talking about?

 

[LordJestix]

BHG/Nexon has disincentivised wars. When i see a war we cannot win i just attack the easiest base i can 5 star without having to use mercs.

I can raid the resources gained from a winning war easily in an hour, and a losing war in just a couple attacks.

I only do wars for loot since the matchmaking is so broken and there are so many p2w features in war.

 

[Penambangliar]

Hmmm. Our lower ally now sit down in the corner waiting the top ally to attack all base. Now they are like garbage. Lol

 

[kennynguyen]

Suggest them should count attack duration for best 5 stars attack instead of first 5 stars attack. That wl be more fun for lower ally to war

 

[LordJestix]

Suggest them should count attack duration for best 5 stars attack instead of first 5 stars attack. That wl be more fun for lower ally to war

They already do count the fastest 5 star attack.

 

[Motaz Tarek]

said that once it was announced

ultimate frustration to lose after doing ur best and getting 5 stars cuz "u didn't do it fast enough"

time factor is an unfair stress factor to use, pay2win alyer who use 4 troop cards will finish faster than a talented player that can get 5* without troop cards and ultimately win the war even if they have the same score

nexon wanted to eliminate stalemates but they actually eliminated fair gameplay in many ways starting from the SH modification to the addition of time factor in wars