Wars

Prodigal Clint

Approved user
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
129
Absolutely ccfoo! So many teams doing it the right way are well represented. I Wonder if Korea Army is employing this base stacking technique? I know they are in the same tier as UA, excelled in the previous medal leaderboard, and now find themselves in the 30's on their way up..... Or do they simply have the patience to stay the course, do it the right way, and find out....
 

Penumbra

Approved user
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
13
Wow! I can't believe they have no shame. Makes me think they are doing it for the loot because they have no bragging rights.
 

DynoBot

Approved user
Joined
Jul 17, 2016
Messages
52
Alliances are using lower level players to play by nexons war rules. We are the best, and we will take any team, any where, anytime, any number of war participants with 12 fricking baby accounts. so get it right, and check yourself. We can beat any alliance with 12 less players and do it in 20 less attacks. Yes we complain when a glitch defeats us, this does not mean we are not the best and we are only adapting to war guidelines set out by Nexon. To everyone who don't know whats UP!! Now you DO.
 
Last edited:

phil_dee

Approved user
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
94
Don't get too excited, we pared that back quite a bit in our last war (as a matchmaking experiment of sorts). I'll let you know if we ever do anything unethical, though.
 

Max_imus

Approved user
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
453
Uhhh, and what about those classical age accounts in your alliance? You surely dont include them in WW, Im sure :eek:
 

jmemira

Approved user
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
55
Wait a second, you're proud that you guys at UA are messing with the matchmaking by putting dummy accounts into war to face easier opponents? You're actually bragging that you can do it in 20 less attacks? It's not because you're a good team it's because you put 27 globals into war against another teams 12; your iron and classical age guys don't make attacks because they are just in there to skew the matches in your favour. If you were really the "best" you wouldn't need to play these games, you'd face opponents that were actually a match for you in level and skill. It's definitely not in the spirit of war or the new glory leaderboards, its exploiting a loophole and it undermines any bragging rights you think you might have by being at the top.
 

UA Bidness

Approved user
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
33
I guess most of you don't realize United Allies has 5 alliances of players. We have some that are doing what you claim we should be doing, playing the best of the best. We ALSO have an alliance that is using iron age bases to increase access to glory and avoid the stalemate/100%+ issues.

One of our alliances has perfected our opponent in every single war since glory was released, and we are not even on the leaderboard. Mind you this is with a level 170 or so team of global age players, matching against opponents just like us. Then we have another alliance with some strong attackers and a bunch of low level accounts, guess which one is doing better on the leaderboards?
 

Max_imus

Approved user
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
453
Well, at least you are truthful. But after you last comment there is nothing more to say to your alliance "attitude"...just enjoy your "wins"
 

Max_imus

Approved user
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
453
I guess most of you don't realize United Allies has 5 alliances of players. We have some that are doing what you claim we should be doing, playing the best of the best. We ALSO have an alliance that is using iron age bases to increase access to glory and avoid the stalemate/100%+ issues.

One of our alliances has perfected our opponent in every single war since glory was released, and we are not even on the leaderboard. Mind you this is with a level 170 or so team of global age players, matching against opponents just like us. Then we have another alliance with some strong attackers and a bunch of low level accounts, guess which one is doing better on the leaderboards?
You are still missing the point brother...

btw how was your WW with Prodigal? How many stars your many,minee,meennie,shittiee achieved?
Ridiculous for all the world to see...
 

JuDomines

Approved user
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
597
After the UA1 vs UA2 story to get easy glory points... that. UA always has been a joke. Every top teams know this and are joking about the deliberate and never ending exploits they use. When you are in a 30v30 against them, you actually face 10-15 guys running multiple accounts (including "bought" ones and now the baby ones). Yes those 10-15 are extremely skilled. They are killers. But, all top tier alliances can do that, using their 10 best players only, running multiple account and crush all alliance they face. It's not hard.
 

JuDomines

Approved user
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
597
I would even let all the glory points on the table to have a chance to perfect the "cool kids" :)
 

Ravenlord

Approved user
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
1,406
Well, here we are - 4 weeks since my first post - and while I'm always stirring the pot, trying to see-what-settles where & trying to get people talking, l never expected the thread to head in this gloomy direction. So what if people are using cheesy tactics? So what if people are not acting honourably? So what if people's behaviour is not up to ''your'' standards?? Despite all the complaints, despite all the gripes, despite all the well aimed slings & arrows into the heart of the enemy l doubt anyone was mortally wounded - or even slightly miffed. :cool:

But what's clear, despite the gripes, is that you're all still warring!! And isn't that the idea?? People keep telling me the best thing about wars is the alliance, the camaraderie, the teammates - so if that's the case then what does it matter what others are doing? Just do your thing and stop worrying about the other guy. If winning, as they say, isn't important but it's how you play the game - then just play ..... and forget the rest of the bullcakes. (No offense BV123 ) :D

Let the others have their moment in the spotlight - or, go for it yourself if that's important to you .... your choice .....
 

JuDomines

Approved user
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
597
"So what?" Hey wake up, this is not a solo game. This is a multiplayer game. Of course I care if someone I compete with is manipulating the system to favor himself! The fun me and my team mates are finding in the game is evaporating when some dudes are lowering their standard in the name of the leaderboard race.
 

Max_imus

Approved user
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
453
I kind of agree with Ravenlord here. (tho I kniw it can be frustrating) ...Even if the opponent does that its not nice, but its a challenge! Thats what we love about that, tough battles, alliance talks and new challenges in WW's :)
 

phil_dee

Approved user
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
94
(JuDomines) Quebec Glory is the strongest we've seen in a while, but had we not went in with an experimental war roster I doubt we would have been paired against them. In the last eight months we've seen a decent number of the current leaderboard alliances, though (including four of the top 25, not counting QG). We lost to them 200-188.
 
Top