What's up with the glory? It sucks that's what's up with it!

[Rambo]

The last war my alliance was in the glory for the win was 2 and row a loss 631, the war we just got matched with an opponent it is 8 for a win and 562 for a loss. That is just crazy I think it should be changed to give you more for a win. How is it for anyone else same problem? The first war was 15 people the new one is 20.

 

[Kam1983]

Yeah yeah, we had the experience. Our previous war : +1 glory or -800. This war : +10 or -650. It s hilarious.

 

[K1ng_kriting]

same situations,+1 or -771
the oppnent have 3 atom and the highest from my alliance is global.
nice world war NEXON

 

[Quovatis]

Yeah, something has changed. Our current war is +12/-1004 against a team that is only 3k glory behind us. But the one before that was +150/-12 against a team that was 4k behind. Doesn't make sense.

 

[Quang t legend]

They said if you sandbagg you get lower glory than usual!

 

[Imaera]

Actually i think they need to hire a math teacher.

 

[Rambo]

I don't sandbag in my alliance we have a pretty good mix. They really need to do something about this crap!

 

[Quang t legend]

I don't sandbag in my alliance we have a pretty good mix.

Unfortunately with the current matchmaking rules the mathematical definition of sandbag is your lower half has lower strength than your upper half!
I guess the penalty apply if you sandbagg more than the opponent and your glory is higher than them.

 

[Quang t legend]

Actually i think they need to hire a math teacher.

No one can teach math to whom believe in the Holy Grenade... and in the Bazooka Tower!

Their refusal to deal with sandbaggers at the source, the broken matchmaking mechanic, amuse me!

 

[Prime]

Our current war we stand to lose more then a much higher ranked team. Which is completely backwards from what they've stated

 

[The Regulator]

Our current war we have 2 glory for a win or -745 for a loss.
Our team has 3 Atomic age players, 3 global and the rest industrial/enlightenment, opponent has 6 atomic, 3 global, 2 Industrial, 2 enlightenment and 1 medival 1 classical.

Their top 3 Atomic players have maxed Atomic walls, and all Lvl 50 generals, we have little chance and will lose massive glory thanks to this constant crap matchmaking imbalance.

 

[Quang t legend]

Our current war we stand to lose more then a much higher ranked team. Which is completely backwards from what they've stated

They said sandbagged team has reduce glory! And even if all your bases is low level than all their base, your team can be more sandbagged than theirs! Because the mathematical definition of sandbagging is the relative strength of your lower half vs your upper half!

 

[Prime]

Our lowest base is industrial theirs is EA. Rest are atomic and global so sandbaging is not the issue, refer to my other post for pics I posted

 

[Quang t legend]

Prime it is not just your 4 lowest bases, it is entire lower half bases vs your entire upper half bases.

 

[Yetanotherusername]

Ridiculous glory, ridiculous matching and ridiculous loot versus the cost of getting full army for a battle. Wonder if dominations is turning into a farming game

 

[Rambo]

Ridiculous glory, ridiculous matching and ridiculous loot versus the cost of getting full army for a battle. Wonder if dominations is turning into a farming game

Yeah sometimes the loot is pretty screwed. A few wars ago I received like 196K for both attacks where as before I would on the average get 700K to over 800K. I'm the top player in my alliance so me and my second highest donate all the troops for war, with the crappy loot I spend more donating troops than I take in!

 

[ELITE JAG]

Once more: the issue has nothing to do with sandbagging. These inversed matches are happening with teams that are not sandbagging. We have been matched three consecutive times with much more powerful teams and neither they nor us were using sandbags. So please, whoever keeps bringing up sandbags, kindly get off the discussion thread so we can help Nexon resolve the issue.