Why cant simply match by glory

[SiuYin]

There is no point to fix sandbag, Just match by glory

1.The only point of world war is glory

2.Stronger alliance deserve higher ranking

3. There are thousands of loophole in match system.

4.current matching is favoring light weight alliance

 

[QuébecGlory]

Alliances restarting at 12,000....that's why. It would never work.

 

[KatZA]

When did you start playing this game?

 

[SebQuattro]

Alliances restarting at 12,000....that's why. It would never work.

Alliance XP/ Perks solves that, assuming the perks are actually useful.

 

[QuébecGlory]

Are you actually having high hopes?

 

[LordJestix]

Matching on glory would be the best thing to do.

The new alliance xp wouldnt work if its anything like coc and has say 10 levels, a really weak alliance could eventually get to level 10 and shouldnt be matching to a team in the top 100 that is also level 10.

 

[Quang t legend]

In MP you are matched by Medal and Ages range, so it will need something other than just Glory to be fair. But maybe we don't need to have fair match, if you are low level you deserve low glory!

 

[Imaera]

You know there are small alliances formed by gunpowder/enlightenment only, warring amongst themselves? They gain glory too. If matched only based on glory, ignoring the HP, they could face only AA alliances. Would that be fair?

 

[LordJestix]

You know there are small alliances formed by gunpowder/enlightenment only, warring amongst themselves? They gain glory too. If matched only based on glory, ignoring the HP, they could face only AA alliances. Would that be fair?

If they are good enough to get up to 20k glory then yes it would be fair. Just like when i play clash royale with my low level account. im good enough on it to have high enough tropyies that i face players that are 3-5 levels higher than me which puts me at a huge disadvantage.

The system would balance its self out. Your alliance would really only face similar alliances to your skill level/power. You get high enough you will face harder alliances and thus lose some glory putting you back to where your alliance probably belongs.

To have glory be the factor in a Top Points list only makes sense to have the matchmaking system based off of that glory otherwise there really is not indication who the top alliances really are.

 

[Quovatis]

Sorry, I'd rather not play the same 3 teams over and over. If the game had more players, then yes, it would work.

 

[LordJestix]

Sorry, I'd rather not play the same 3 teams over and over. If the game had more players, then yes, it would work.

It could be done that its based on glory, but you cannot face the same team more than once every 10 wars.

 

[Quovatis]

and then we'd never get a match. Who would KA face?

 

[LordJestix]

The search would need to expand the range somewhat if it cannot find a match. Things like this need to have forward thinking as if they will fix everything and our player base will explode. Otherwise things will have to be rehashed over and over again if the game ever takes off like it has the potential to do.

 

[Drunken Master]

Bad rabbits have 18000 glory... Our last 3 match ups have been against teams in the top 75 alliances in the world... We like the challenge and have been competitive, but haven't won... We deserve a spot on the leaderboard, but will have a lot of trouble getting there based on the fact we can only match with top tier alliances... Meanwhile, just looking at the leaderboards, I am sure we can handle about 25%of alliances on there quite easily... The issue is we are too strong to match up with them because their weight is too low... How is it fair that alliances that are not the best in the game carry leaderboard positions... Teams keep their war weight low and beat up on weak alliances collecting glory without a challenge. Meanwhile my alliance faces strongholds full of elephant archers in every base. The system is broke. The leaderboards should be for the strongest alliances. The way glory is setup, I can make an Alliance enlightenment and under and have a chance at reaching the leaderboards. I think glory should be a measure of strength. This is a good idea, Imo...

 

[SiuYin]

There is no point to fix sandbag, Just match by glory

1.The only point of world war is glory

2.Stronger alliance deserve higher ranking

3. There are thousands of loophole in match system.

4.current matching is favoring light weight alliance

 

[SebQuattro]

Sorry, I'd rather not play the same 3 teams over and over. If the game had more players, then yes, it would work.

The game has at least 600,000 players. How many players do you want?

 

[SiuYin]

The game has at least 600,000 players. How many players do you want?

But I keep encounter same player in raid
I guess only a small potion player reached AA (or even small potion in GA0
most players were quit before IA