World War Matchmaking

[Lordwinman]

World War Matchmaking needs to be changed to make it fair...Many alliances are using close to half Iron Age players to get easy WWs. This is not fair and demoralizing for alliances in these WWs..The matchmaking algorithm needs to match the top half strongest players with the top half strongest players from the opponents..Since each player has 2 attacks you only need the top 10 to win a 20 vers 20...This change would eliminate ridiculous matchups and would eliminate those sand bags or dummy Iron Age players being used for that purpose..Hard earned Glory gained from WWs would regain its true purpose .I have totally lost interest in participating in WWs until this is changed.. ..Your Thoughts.....Lord Winman

 

[Mixie]

There should be a new matchmaking system soon. We shall see.

 

[Saruman the White]

Matchmaking by glory. You win, you rise, you get tougher opponents. You lose, you fall, you get easier next time. Simple as that. All else is just noise

 

[oddin]

i've been syaing that constantly but many people disagree

 

[No Angel]

This might make me be bullied But I feel lately it's not about matchmaking, it's about people you bring into war.
When we have wide range levels with strong attackers on top we'll most likely win no matter how the matchmaking brings us.
I've been experimenting with formation and I realize that the formation determines the winning.
It might be hard for alliances with limited members, or alliance with ''take everyone who's opting in'' motto. But if we want to win, we need to try to strategize everything and accept changes.
I feel lucky and thankful that even we're small alliance there are people joining and make a big difference in world wars

 

[Berend_War]

Not going to bully you.
But do you think including excluding members is how they initially design the game? I understand what your saying and yes if I split up the team we get better matches. 90% of the players use there attack in our alliance why should we exclude them because the matchmaking system is wrong and can manipulated?

 

[albynos]

@ Saruman the White: Hi there, I'm the one that disagrees - LOL. Matchmaking by glory or medals it does not work simply because winning or loosing it is not directly related to the army or defense size. Correct me if I'm wrong but you are not winning because of your huge experience in winning battles, but because of the power of your army (or defence). This is lead byt the current player level, not medals or glory.
No matter if it is ww matchmaking or multiplayer matchmaking, the battle is always one to one.

 

[No Angel]

Berend_War They designed the game so we could strategize on arranging our war team