World War unofficial leaderboard

phil_dee

Approved user
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
94
No Title

USA Dankness moves to 26-2.
 

Attachments

  • photo6402.jpg
    photo6402.jpg
    11.1 KB · Views: 54
  • photo6403.jpg
    photo6403.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 49
  • photo6404.jpg
    photo6404.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 55

dannemare

Approved user
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
96
Did the updates stop?

They might as well. :) IMO, this thread is kinda like having a forum thread comparing winning statistics from junior leagues and super bowl. :) Some of the top alliances with a lower win/lose ratio would completely demolish lower-level alliances with an otherwise higher win/lose ratio. It's a pointless comparison. IMO. :)
 

dannemare

Approved user
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
96
Here is what Nexon/BHG should do:

**WORLD WAR TOURNAMENT**

*) Start out by removing all the junior alliances with an alliance score of less than 10,000.
*) Use whatever ranking system is used today for matching WW opponents and create "segments" of alliances based on that ranking system.
*) Take each segment and remove all alliances having done less than 20 wars.
*) Take each segment and remove all alliances except for those who represent the top 5 (those with the best win/lose ratio in each segment).
In situations where more than 5 alliances represent the top 5, simply include them all (simple example: 8 alliances in a segment all have a 100% win ratio).

Now we have a list of alliances with a solid world war record, and they represent the entire war ranking ladder, so to say.


Qualification:

Each segment battles it out internally (each alliance will do one battle against all the other alliances in the segment).

The top two alliances (sorted first by stars won, next by destruction percentage) within each segments go to the actual tournament.


Tournament:

The tournament begins with X alliances, divided into Y groups.

Each alliance meets the others in its group just once.
The winning alliance and the runner-up from each group then progress to the next round.

The winning team from one group then battles against the runner-up from another group.

In summary, kinda like this...:

http://www.aussportsbetting.com/images/2012-06-05_euro_knockouts.gif


Pre-requirements:

1) The tournament must have a public battle log with all the necessary statistical details.

2) WW replays must be introduced (and replay accuray must be improved).

3) Announce the tournament 1 month in advance to let more alliances get a chance to reach a minimum of 20 World Wars.

4) After the qualification round, players with maxed out walls/gates are asked to show receipts for crown purchases or otherwise document how they achieved looting more than 3,700,000,000 gold (Nexon/BGH can pull the exact looting amount from each player's account, but I'm not sure if they can view a player's payment history, because this goes though the App Store or Google play). Players who cannot provide sufficient documentation are kicked. This rule should motivate alliances to kick cheaters prior to entering the WORLD WAR TOURNAMENT.


Optional:

Let replays be public (and easily accessible/searchable in a web browser as well). Publicly publish replays as soon as battles are done.
 

Europeos

Approved user
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
146
Still a better indicator of how skilled alliances are than the medals rankings if you ask me ;)
 

Genyl

Approved user
Joined
Oct 29, 2015
Messages
11
Hi,

I appreciated your effort but it seems like a titanic task to be honest. It is just too difficult to track, alliance have to post results etc

My guild is doing a WW every two days and we have lost 4- 5 wars as long as I remember. Considering this has been 2 months out that would put us around 25-5. I checked and recent activity is 11-1 , we only lost to some Canadian guys who were awesome. I am sure they have an even better ratio

My point: this list gives very incomplete information. After reading it I still have no idea how to the top guilds fare
 

molfas

Approved user
Joined
Sep 11, 2015
Messages
82
No Title

Kaiserreich is winning big again. Score 7:0
 

Attachments

  • photo6420.jpg
    photo6420.jpg
    100.4 KB · Views: 48
  • photo6421.jpg
    photo6421.jpg
    128.6 KB · Views: 57

Nathan Win

Approved user
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
842
Updated rankings:

Best win/lose ratio:


1 Phoenix Legion 100% (13 wins)
2 Kaiserreich 100% (6 wins)
3 Ownage 100% (2 win)
4 United Allies 96% (22 wins)

5 USA Templars 95% (20 wins)
6 The 1st Dynasty 94% (17 wins)
7 USA 2.0 94% (16 wins)
8 Last Rites 93% (14 wins)
9 USA Dankness 93% (26 wins)
10 Sparta or Death 88% (15 wins)
11 Elite Generals 84% (25 wins)
12 The Wolves 85% (11 wins)
13 DomiActive Fury 83% (15 wins)
14 Barcelona 60% (6 wins)


Most wins:

1 USA Dankness 26-2
2 Elite Generals 26-5
3 United Allies 22-1

4 USA Templars 20-1
5 The 1st Dynasty 17-1
6 USA 2.0 16-1
7 Sparta or Death 15-2
8 DomiActive Fury 15-3
9 Last Rites 14-1
10 Phoenix Legion 13-0
11 The Wolves 11-2
12 Kaiserreich 6-0
13 Barcelona 6-4
14 Ownage 2-0




As we don't have any official leaderboard yet and World War history seems to be broken, I thought we could make one here. Just report the results here. Please try to give as much information as possible regarding your war results and post screenshots for better reliability. I'll start with our alliance results: The 1st Dynasty: 3 wins 0 loss 1st win vs top dominators, 66-48 2nd win vs Korea Army 85-72 3rd win vs Korea Pride 82-75



Hi Europeos, if you can update our wins to 26 in the win/lose ratio, still seeing it at 25. Thanks :)
 
Top